QONUNCHILIKDAGI BOʻSHLIQLARNI ANIQLASHDA NORMATIV-HUQUQIY HUJJATLAR IJROSI MONITORINGINING AHAMIYATI
Kalit so‘zlar:
qonunchilik, huquqiy monitoring, normativ-huquqiy hujjat, huquqdagi boʻshliq, huquqni qoʻllash, huquqiy kolliziya, tartibga solish taʼsiri, norma ijodkorligiAnnotatsiya
Maqolada qonunchilikdagi boʻshliqlarni aniqlashda normativ-huquqiy hujjatlar ijrosi monitoringining nazariy-huquqiy va amaliy ahamiyati tahlil qilingan. Qonunchilikdagi boʻshliq tushunchasi, uning huquqiy kolliziya, yuridik-texnik xato va samarasiz normadan farqlari koʻrsatilgan. Monitoring huquqiy tartibga solish ehtiyojini aniqlash, normativ-huquqiy hujjat maqsadi bilan amaliy natijani taqqoslash hamda huquqni qoʻllash amaliyotida yuzaga kelayotgan muammolarni aniqlash vositasi sifatida yoritilgan. Qonunchilikdagi boʻshliqlarni aniqlashda formal-yuridik va konkret-sotsiologik metodlarni birgalikda qoʻllash zarurati asoslangan. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining amaldagi qonunchiligi, xususan, normativ-huquqiy hujjatlar ijrosi monitoringining 2025-yildan joriy etilgan yangi modeli tahlil qilingan. Monitoringning natijadorligini oshirish maqsadida uning obyektlarini tanlash mezonlarini belgilash, jamoatchilik ishtirokini kengaytirish, monitoring natijalarini ochiq eʼlon qilish, sud amaliyoti va murojaatlarni raqamli tahlil qilish hamda monitoring hisobotlarining huquqiy oqibatlarini kuchaytirishga qaratilgan takliflar ishlab chiqilgan.
Iqtiboslar
Eshturdiyeva, F. B. (2026). Huquqiy boʻshliq fenomeni va uni bartaraf etish: Oʻzbekiston fuqarolik qonunchiligi misolida [The phenomenon of legal gaps and their elimination: On the example of Uzbekistanʼs civil legislation]. Jurisprudence, 6(1), 11–20.
European Commission. (2021). Better regulation guidelines. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2021-11/swd2021_305_en.pdf
Knap, L. J., Friele, R. D., van Gameren, R., & Legemaate, J. (2025). Factors influencing the impact of ex-post legislative evaluations: A scoping review. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 31(3), 852–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2023.2268320
Lazarev, V. V. (1974). Probely v prave i puti ikh ustraneniya [Gaps in law and ways to eliminate them]. Legal Literature.
Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025, February 7). On approval of the methodology for monitoring the implementation of regulatory legal acts (Registration No. 3605). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/7370767
Mousmouti, M. (2018). Making legislative effectiveness an operational concept: Unfolding the effectiveness test as a conceptual tool for lawmaking. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 9(3), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2018.53
OECD. (2020). Reviewing the stock of regulation (OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy). OECD Publ. https://doi.org/10.1787/1a8f33bc-en
OECD. (2021). OECD regulatory policy outlook 2021. OECD Publ. https://doi.org/10.1787/38b0fdb1-en
OECD. (2022). Better regulation practices across the European Union 2022. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6e4b095d-en
Petrov, A. A., & Tikhonravov, E. Y. (2017). Probely i kollizii v prave: uchebnoe i nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie [Gaps and conflicts in law: An educational and scientific-practical guide]. Prospekt.
Popelier, P. (2012). The court as regulatory watchdog: The procedural approach in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. In P. Popelier, A. Mazmanyan, & W. Vandenbruwaene (Eds.), The role of constitutional courts in multilevel governance (pp. 249–269). Intersentia.
President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024, August 16). On measures to ensure the stability and improve the quality and effectiveness of legal regulation of social relations (Decree No. DP-111). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/7069968
Ranchordas, S. (2017). Consultations, citizen narratives and evidence-based regulation: The strange case of the consultation on the collaborative economy (University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2924461). SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2924461
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2021, April 20). On normative legal acts (Law No. LRU-682). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/5378966
Shermuhamedova, N. (2008). Falsafa va fan metodologiyasi. Communicator.
Tikhomirov, Y. A. (2015). Pravo: Prognozy i riski [Law: Forecasts and risks]. INFRA-M.
Van Aeken, K. (2011). From vision to reality: Ex post evaluation of legislation. Legisprudence, 5(1), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.5235/175214611796404859
Xanthaki, H. (2014). Drafting legislation: Art and technology of rules for regulation. Hart Publ.
Yuklab Olishlar
Nashr qilingan
Son
Bo‘lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 YURISPRUDENSIYA
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ostida litsenziyalangan.
