UYUSHGAN JINOYATCHILIKNI TERGOV QILISHNING DASTLABKI BOSQICHIDA TIPIK TERGOV VAZIYATLARI XORIJIY DAVLATLAR MISOLIDA
Kalit so‘zlar:
FQB, maxfiy agentlar, elektron kuzatuv, anti-mafiya, FJX, anonim ko‘rsatmaAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada uyushgan jinoyatchilikka qarshi tergov harakatlaridagi vaziyatlar rivojlangan davlatlar misolida o‘rganilgan. Uyushgan jinoyatchilikka qarshi kurashish chora-tadbirlari doimiy ravishda takomillashtirilishi va shu chora-tadbirlar uyushgan jinoyatchilik rivojlanishining oldini olish xususiyatga ega boʻlishi kerak. Ya’ni operativ xodimlar jinoyat haqida ma’lumotlarni tezkor to‘plashi va tahlil qilishi yangi metodlar qo‘llashni talab etadi. Ushbu holatlarning har biri jinoiy harakatning muayyan mexanizmi bilan bog‘liq bo‘lgan kam qamrovli, shuningdek, jinoyatni aniqlash, bostirish va fosh qilish faktlari bilan tergov holatlarini o‘z ichiga olishi mumkin. Uyushgan jinoyatchilikka qarshi kurashni jinoyat-protsessual tartibga solish doirasida isbotlash muammosi, ayniqsa, dolzarbdir. Ya’ni dalillarni qonunga xilof ravishda olish uning maqbulligiga ta’sir o‘tkazadi va ulardan foydalanish sudda muammolar keltirib chiqaradi. Maqolada uyushgan jinoiyatchilikni tergov qilishda samarali metodlarning qo‘llanilishi yoritilgan. Shuningdek, majburiy va ixtiyoriy jinoiy ta’qiblar amaliyoti, kuzatuv ostida to’plangan ma’lumotlarni yetkazib berish, jinoiy sheriklarning ko‘rsatmalaridan foydalanish va dalillarning sudda maqbulligi muhokama qilingan. Tergov harakatlarini rivojlangan davlatlar qonunchiligi bo’yicha protsessual tartibda olib borilishi bayon etilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Wheatley J.K. U.S. Law enforcement techniques against organized crime groups.
2. Ohr B.G. Effective methods to combat transnational organized crime in criminal justice processes.
3. EU Strategy to tackle Organised Crime. 2021–2025.
4. Basamanowicz J., Bouchard M. Overcoming the Warez paradox: online piracy groups and situational crime prevention. Policy Int., 2011, no. 3 (2), pp. 1–25.
5. Beauregard E., Proulx J., Rossmo K., Leclerc B., Allaire J-F. Script analysis of the hunting process of offenders. Crim Justice Behav., 2007, no. 34 (8), pp. 1069–1084.
6. Bellotti E., Spencer J., Lord N., Benson K. Counterfeit alcohol distribution: a criminological script network analysis. Eur J Criminol., 2020, no. 17 (4), pp. 373–398.
7. Borrion H. Quality assurance in crime scripting. Crime Sci, 2 2013, no. (6), pp. 1–12
8. Bowen G.A. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res, 2009, no. 9 (2),
pp. 27–40.
9. Brayley H., Cockbain E., Laycock G. The value of crime scripting. Policing, 2011, no. 5 (2),
pp. 132–143.
10. Bryman A. Soc res methods. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
11. Criminal Intelligence Analysis. West Yorkshire Police, 1998.
12. IACP, Criminal Intelligence Sharing: A National Plan for Intelligence-Led Policing at the Local, State and Federal Levels. 2002, August.
13. Tompson L., Chainey S.P. Profling illegal waste activity: using crime scripts as a data collection and analytical strategy. Eur J Crim Policy Res, 2011, no. 17 (3), pp. 179–201.
14. Clarke R.V., Felson M. Introduction: criminology, routine activity, and rational choice. Routine activity and rational choice. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 1993.
15. Meshcheryakov V.A. Prestupleniya v sfere kompyuternoy informatsii: pravovoy i kriminalisticheskiy analiz [Crimes in the sphere of computer information: legal and forensic analysis]. Voronezh, Voronezh State University, 2001, p. 320.
