FUQAROLIK PROTSESSIDA ODIL SUDLOVNI AMALGA OSHIRISHGA KOʻMAKLASHUVCHI SHAXS SIFATIDA GUVOHNING ISHTIROKI BILAN BOGʻLIQ AYRIM MASALALAR
Kalit so‘zlar:
fuqarolik sudi, odil sudlov, sudya, guvoh, guvohning daxlsizligi, guvoh immuniteti, guvoh koʻrsatmasi, guvohlik berishni rad etish, guvohlik berishdan bosh tortish, odil sudlovni amalga oshirishga koʻmaklashuvchi shaxslar.Annotatsiya
Mazkur maqolada fuqarolik protsessida odil sudlovni amalga oshirishga koʻmaklashuvchi shaxs sifatida guvohning ishtiroki bilan bogʻliq ayrim masalalar tahlil etilgan. Xususan, fuqarolik protsessida guvoh tushunchasi, uning protsessual huquq va majburiyatlari boʻyicha fuqarolik protsessual qonunchiligi hamda fuqarolik protsessual huquqi fani nazariyasiga oid huquqshunos olimlarning ilmiy-nazariy qarashlari o‘rganilgan. Shuningdek, guvoh sifatida chaqirilishi va soʻroq qilinishi mumkin boʻlmagan holatlar, bu boradagi xorijiy davlatlar fuqarolik protsessual qonunchiligi, xususan, Germaniya, Rossiya Federatsiyasi, Ozarbayjon, Belarus, Qozogʻiston Respublikalari fuqarolik protsessual qonunchiligi milliy fuqarolik protsessual qonunchilik bilan qiyosiy tahlil etilib, tegishli xulosa va takliflar ishlab chiqilgan. Maqolada guvohning guvohlik berishdan bosh tortish huquqi tushunchasi, guvohning daxlsizligi yoki guvohning immunitet huquqi tushunchalari toʻgʻrisida huquqshunos olimlarning ilmiy-nazariy qarashlari tadqiq qilingan. Bundan tashqari, ushbu maqolada guvohlarning xavfsizligi masalalari, bu borada xorijiy davlatlar qonunchiligi ko‘rib chiqilgan. Xulosa qismida sud ishlarini yuritishda guvohning protsessual huquqiy maqomini takomillashtirish, xorijiy davlatlar tajribasidan kelib chiqib, guvoh sifatida chaqirilishi va soʻroq qilinishi mumkin boʻlmagan holatlar doirasini kengaytirish, guvohlarning daxlsizlik huquqlarini amalda taʼminlash, ularning xavfsizligini amalga oshirish chora-tadbirlarini kuchaytirish boʻyicha fuqarolik protsessual qonunchilikni takomillashtirishga oid ilmiy-nazariy xulosalar, taklif va tavsiyalar ilgari surilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Grazhdanskiy protsess [Civil process]. Moscow, Spark Publ., 1999, 184 p.
2. Grazhdanskiy protsess zarubezhnykh stran [Civil process of foreign countries]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2008, p. 221.
3. Treushnikov M.K. Grazhdanskiy protsess [Civil process]. Moscow, Gorodets Publ., 2000, pp. 233–238.
4. Zvyagintseva L.M., Plyukhina M.A., Reshetnikova I.V. Evidence in zhudicial practice in civil cases. Moscow, Norma-Infra Publ., 2000, pp. 22–42.
5. Shorahmetov Sh.Sh. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksiga sharhlar [Notes to the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, TSIL, 2010, p. 102.
6. Mamasiddiqov M.M. Fuqarolik protsessi [Civil procedure]. Tashkent, Baktriapress Publ., 2014, p. 140.
7. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksi [Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, Justice Publ., 2022, p. 38.
8. Grazhdanskoye protsessual’noye ulozheniye Germanii [Code of Civil Procedure of Germany]. Moscow, Infotropic Media Publ., 2016, pp. 128–129.
9. Grazhdanskiy protsessual’nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan [Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs
10. Grazhdanskiy protsessual’nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation]. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru
11. Grazhdanskiy protsessual’nyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus [Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Belarus]. Available at: https://kodeksy-by.com/grazhdanskizh_ protsessualnyzh_kodeks_rb.htm
12. Grazhdanskiy protsessual’nyy kodeks Respubliki Latviya [Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Latvia]. Available at: http: http://cld.privatelaw.ru/snglaw/snglaw.htm.
13. Grazhdanskiy protsessual’nyy kodeks Azerbaydzhanskoy Respubliki [Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaizhan]. Available at: https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30420065#pos=576
14. Fokina M., Gramov N., Konev V. Svidetel’skiy immunitet i yego vidy v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Witness immunity and its types in civil proceedings]. Legality, 2006, no. 4, 41 p.
15. Xromykh Y.V. Ponyatiye i vidy svidetel’skogo immuniteta [The concept and types of witness immunity]. State and Law, 2015, no. 1, pp. 183–186.
16. Reshetnikova I.V Dokazatelstvennoye pravo v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Evidence law in civil proceedings]. Ekaterinburg, 2007, p. 100.
17. Petukhovskiy A. Svidetel’skiy immunitet: problemy razvitiya protsessual’nogo instituta [Witness immunity: problems of the development of the procedural institution]. Russian Justice, 2013, no. 9, p. 16.
18. Gosudarstvennaya programma «Obespecheniye bezopasnosti poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva na 2014–2018 gody» [State program “Ensuring the safety of victims, witnesses and other participants in criminal proceedings for 2014–2018”]. Official website of the Government of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://www.government.ru
19. Zhurkina O.V. Sravnitel’niy analiz gosudarstvennoy programmy zashhity svideteley v Rossii i SShA [Comparative analysis of the state witness protection program in Russia and the USA]. Orenburg State University.
20. Pravovyye osnovy zashhity svideteley v Avstrii [Legal basis for the protection of witnesses in Austria]. Foreign experience of legal regulation on the protection of participants in legal proceedings and the practice of its application. Moscow, 2000, 356 p.
21. Slate R.N. The federal Witness Protection Program: its evolution and continuing growing pains. Criminal Justice Ethics, 1997.
