MISR ARAB RESPUBLIKASI JINOYAT QONUNCHILIGIDA JAZONI YENGILLASHTIRISH INSTITUTI
Kalit so‘zlar:
shariat, jinoyat qonunining ortga qaytish kuchi, yengillashtiruvchi holatlar, og‘irlashtiruvchi holatlar, yengilroq jazo tayinlash, jinoyatda ishtirokchilik, tamom bo‘lmagan jinoyat, cheklangan aqli rasolik, voyaga yetmagan shaxs, shartli hukm, jazoni o‘tashdan muddatidan ilgari shartli ozod qilish, afv etish, amnistiya, aybga iqrorlik to‘g‘risida kelishuv, yuridik shaxsAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada Misr Arab Respublikasi jinoyat qonun hujjatlarida o‘z aksini topgan jazoni yengillashtirish instituti, shu jumladan, jinoyat qonunining ortga qaytish kuchi, tamom bo‘lmagan jinoyatlarning suiqasd bosqichida sodir etilgan jinoyatlar uchun jazo tayinlash, og‘irlashtiruvchi va yengillashtiruvchi holatlarni inobatga olgan holda jazo tayinlash, voyaga yetmaganlar jinoiy javobgarligining o‘ziga xos xususiyatlari, yengilroq jazo tayinlash tartibi, Misr Arab Respublikasi Jinoyat kodeksi Maxsus qismida nazarda tutilgan yengillashtiruvchi tarkibli jinoyatlar, afv etish va amnistiya masalalari, ishtirokchilikda sodir etilgan jinoyatlar uchun jazoni yengillashtirish va jazodan ozod qilish, shartli hukm qilish, jazoni o‘tashdan muddatidan ilgari shartli ozod qilish, provokatsiya, yuridik shaxslarning jinoiy javobgarligiga doir ayrim masalalar, aqli norasolik va cheklangan aqli rasolik holatida sodir etilgan jinoyatlar uchun jazo tayinlash, aybga iqrorlik to‘g‘risida kelishuv tuzilgan taqdirda, jazo tayinlash masalalari hamda maxsus qonun hujjatlari va mamlakat Jinoyat-protsessual kodeksining jinoiy jazoni yengillashtirishda tutgan o‘rni tahlil qilinib, yakuniy fikr sifatida Misr Arab Respublikasining ayrim jinoyat-huquqiy me’yorlarini O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat kodeksiga tatbiq etishga doir takliflar ishlab chiqilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Rustambaev M.H. Kurs ugolovnogo prava Respubliki Uzbekistan [The course of criminal law of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. The general part. Vol. 2. The Doctrine of Punishment. Tashkent, Military Technical Institute of the National Guard of the Republic of Uzbekistan Publ., 2018, p. 375.
2. Usmonaliev M., Bakunov P. Jazo tayinlashda yengillashtiruvchi holatlarni hisobga olish [Consideration of mitigating factors when imposing punishment]. Tashkent, Justice Publ., 2007, p. 58.
3. Tozhiyev Je.A. Ponyatie i ugolovno-pravovoye znacheniye obstoyatel’stv, smyagchayushhikh nakazaniye [The concept and criminal-legal significance of mitigating factors]. Nukus, Knowledge Publ., 2000, p. 68.
4. Nazarov M.A. Naznacheniye nakazaniya v ugolovnom prave Respubliki Uzbekistan [Imposition of punishment under the criminal law of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, Yustitsiya Publ., 2013, p. 163.
5. Nazarov M.A. Naznachenie nakazanija v ugolovnom prave Respubliki Uzbekistan. [Imposition of punishment under the criminal law of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Тashkent, 2020, p. 51.
6. Garayeva A.R. Smyagcheniye nakazaniya pri ego ispolnenii v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave [Mitigation of punishment in its execution in Russian criminal law]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Kazan, 2007, p. 209.
7. Kachan M.I. Obstoyatel’stva, smyagchayushhiye nakazaniye, v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave [Mitigating factors in Russian criminal law]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Rostov-Don, 2005, p. 199.
8. Koliyev V.L. Smyagcheniye nakazaniya po ugolovnomu pravu: teoreticheskiy, pravovoy i pravoprimenitel’nyy aspekty [Mitigation of punishment under criminal law: theoretical, legal and law enforcement aspects]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Volgograd, 2003, p. 182.
9. Tasakov S.V. Otvetstvennost’ za ubiystvo pri smyagchayushhikh obstoyatel’stvakh po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii [Liability for murder under mitigating factors at the criminal law of Russia]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Cheboksary, 2000, p. 210.
10. Hayrullina R.G. Smyagchayushhiye obstoyatel’stva, uchityvayemyye sudom pri naznachenii nakazaniya, po ugolovnomu zakonodatel’stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran [Mitigating factors taken into account by the court when imposing punishment under the criminal legislation of Russia and foreign countries]. Abstract of PhD thesis. Kazan, 2006, p. 192.
11. Egyptian Penal Code in Arabic dated 1937 – Law No. 58. Available at: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/research/Egypt/Egypt%20Penal%20Code.pdf (accessed 17.10.2023).
12. Egyptian Penal Code in English dated 1937 – Law No. 58. Available at: https://lawyer-egy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Egypt-The-Penal-Code-Law-1937.pdf (accessed 17.10.2023).
13. Yermolayeva E.L., Gribina G.A., Ilyushina E.S., Kokareva M.E., Fedoseyeva L.A. Osobennosti ugolovnogo prava Gruzii, Egipta i Brazilii [Features of the Criminal Law of Georgia, Egypt and Brazil]. Sovremennyye nauchnyye issledovaniya i innovatsii – Modern Scientific Research and Innovation, 2019, no. 7. Available at: https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2019/07/89882 (accessed 17.10.2023).
14. Peters R. The codification of criminal law in nineteenth century Egypt: tradition or modernization? Eds. M. Abun-Nasr, U. Spellenberg, & U. Wanitzek. Law, society, and national identity in Africa? 1990, pp. 211–225. Helmut Buske Verlag. Available at: https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/1053710/82026_326733.pdf (accessed 17.10.2023)/
15. Egyptian Criminal Procedure Code in English dated 1950. Available at: https://egyptjustice.com/criminal-law (accessed 17.10.2023).
16. Paradelle M. The Notion of ‘Person’ between Law and Practice: A Study of the Principles of Personal Responsibility and of the Personal Nature of Punishment in Egyptian Criminal Law. Standing Trial, Law and the Person in the Modern Middle East, Edited by Baudouin Dupret. Publ. in 2004 by
I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd, London. New York, p. 382.
17. Al-Mohannadi H.L. The Victim’s Role in the Islamic Justice Process: A Comparative Study. PhD thesis. University of Southampton, Faculty of Law, 1999, August, 314 p. Available at: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/463936/1/704372.pdf/ (accessed 17.10.2023).
18. Arafa M.A. Attempted Criminal Offences in Egyptian Criminal Law. Revista Cidadania e Direitos Humanos, Caruaru, 2016, Jan – Jun, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 85–115. ISSN 2447-1399. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1933648/ (accessed 17.10.2023).
19. Arafa M.A. Criminal Complicity: Accomplices Criminal Liability to the Criminal Offences:
a Comparative Analysis Between the Egyptian Criminal Law System and the Criminal Law System of the United States of America. Revista de Estudos Criminais, ANO XVI, 2017, no. 67, pp. 4–49. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1933635/ (accessed 17.10.2023).
20. Overview of the Juvenile Justice System (Egypt). Available at: https://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/egypt0203/egyptkids0203-02.htm#P271_50575/ (accessed 17.10.2023).
21. Baudouin Dupret. Normality, Responsibility, Morality: Virginity and Rape in an Egyptian Legal Context. Yearbook of the Sociology of Islam, 2000. Available at: https://hal.science/hal-02612856
22. Reza S. Egypt: Criminal Law. Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law, Stanford University Press, 2011, January 1, pp. 179–209. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1854895/ (accessed 17.10.2023).
23. The Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt in English. 2014. Available at: https://www.sis.gov.eg/Newvr/Dustor-en001.pdf/ (accessed 17.10.2023).
24. Gaber M. Reforming the Death Penalty in Egypt: An Islamic Law Perspective. Maurer Theses and Dissertations, 2017, p. 52. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/etd/52/ (accessed 17.10.2023).
25. Kotb A., Bacha Ch. The criminal liability of companies and their Representatives in Egypt. Available at: https://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/the-criminal-liability-of-companies-and-their-representatives-in-egypt/ (accessed 17.10.2023).
