ISBOTLASH TIZIMIDA RAQAMLI DALILLARDAN FOYDALANISHNING MUAMMOLI JIHATLARI

Mualliflar

Kalit so‘zlar:

jinoyat protsessi, isbotlash, raqamli dalillar, elektron dalillar, dalillarning maqbulligi, raqamli kriminalistika, kompyuter-texnika ekspertizasi, elektron ma’lumotlar

Annotatsiya

Maqolada O‘zbekiston Respublikasi jinoyat protsessida raqamli dalillardan foydalanishning nazariy va amaliy muammolari tadqiq etilgan. Mavzuning dolzarbligi axborot-kommunikatsiya texnologiyalari yordamida sodir etilayotgan jinoyatlar sonining ortib borayotgani hamda raqamli dalillarni to‘plash, mustahkamlash, saqlash, tekshirish va baholashning jinoyat-protsessual maqomi, ularning maqbulligi va ishonchliligi xususiyatlari, kompyuter-texnika ekspertizalarini tayinlash va o‘tkazish tartibi, shuningdek, protsessual qonunbuzarliklarning jinoyatlarni tergov qilish samaradorligiga ta’siri tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqotning metodologik asosini rasmiy-yuridik, tizimli va tahliliy metodlar tashkil etadi. Izlanishlar natijasida huquqni muhofaza qilish amaliyotidagi asosiy huquqiy va texnik muammolar aniqlanib, jinoyat-protsessual qonunchiligini rivojlantirish, ekspertlik faoliyatini takomillashtirish va raqamli kriminalistika sohasida kadrlar tayyorlash sifatini oshirish bo‘yicha takliflar ilgari surilgan.

Iqtiboslar

Afonin, A. (2026, March). Chain of custody: Rol tsepochki khraneniya dokazatelstv v tsifrovoy kriminalistike [Chain of custody: The role of the evidence preservation chain in digital forensics]. ElcomSoft Blog. https://blog.elcomsoft.ru/2026/03/chain-of-custody-rol-czepochki-hraneniya-dokazatelstv-v-czifrovoj-kriminalistike/

Begishev, I. R., & Mayorov, A. V. (2026). Tsifrovaya transformatsiya ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: Teoreticheskie osnovy i problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya [Digital transformation of criminal proceedings: Theoretical foundations and problems of legal regulation]. Law and Order: History, Theory, Practice, 1(48), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.47475/2311-696X-2026-48-1-67-72

Center for Cybersecurity of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024). Kiberprestupnost v Uzbekistane: kakie vozrastnye gruppy podverzheny risku [Cybercrime in Uzbekistan: Which age groups are at risk]. https://csu.uz/ru/news/ozbekistonda-kiberjinoyatlar

Gavrilin, Yu. V., & Saleeva, Yu. E. (2023). Razvitie ucheniya o kriminalisticheskoy registratsii v usloviyakh tsifrovoy transformatsii prestupnosti [Development of the doctrine of criminalistic registration in the context of the digital transformation of crime]. Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2(66), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-9391-2023-266-99-105

Guseva, I. I., & Ionova, A. V. (2025). Tsifrovizatsiya ugolovnogo protsessa v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Digitalization of criminal procedure in contemporary conditions]. Digital Technologies and Law, 1(2), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.digteclaw.137032

Konovalov, I. (2025). Dostovernost elektronnykh dokazatelstv: sistemnyy podkhod v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Reliability of electronic evidence: A systemic approach in criminal proceedings]. Society and Innovation, 6(1), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol6-iss1-pp262-268

Kostenko, R. V. (2025). Dopustimost dokazatelstv v tsifrovuyu epokhu: transformatsiya protsessualnykh standartov [Admissibility of evidence in the digital age: Transformation of procedural standards]. Legal Bulletin of Kuban State University, 1, 30–35.

Naumenko, O. A., & Khalin, V. D. (2023). Kriminalisticheskie aspekty issledovaniya tsifrovykh obyektov pri rassledovanii prestupleniy [Criminalistic aspects of the study of digital objects in crime investigation]. Society and Law, 3(85), 76–81.

Pulatov, T. (2026). Electronic evidence in corruption cases: Admissibility, reliability, chain of custody. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 6(4), 2295–2305.

Republic of Uzbekistan. (1995). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/111463

Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024, November 26). Law “On Amendments and Supplements to Certain Legislative Acts of the Republic of Uzbekistan Aimed at Improving the System of Working with Digital Evidence” (No. LRU-1003). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/ru/pdfs/7228823

Rustambekov, I., & Gulyamov, S. (2026). Tsifrovoe pravo – velenie vremeni: kak Uzbekistan stanovitsya liderom Tsentralnoy Azii v podgotovke kiber-yuristov [Digital law as the imperative of the times: How Uzbekistan is becoming a Central Asian leader in training cyber lawyers]. Yuz.uz. https://yuz.uz/ru/news/tsifrovoe-pravo--velenie-vremeni-kak-uzbekistan-stanovitsya-liderom-tsentralnoy-azii-v-podgotovke-kiber-yuristov

Savitskaya, I. G. (2016). Uchastie spetsialista v sledstvennykh deystviyakh, svyazannykh s izyatiem elektronnykh nositeley informatsii [Participation of a specialist in investigative actions involving the seizure of electronic data carriers]. The Judiciary and Criminal Procedure, 2, 250–254.

Shipilov, K. V. (2024). Dokazatelstva v elektronnoy forme v ugolovnom protsesse zarubezhnykh stran [Electronic evidence in the criminal procedure of foreign countries]. Current Research, 30(212). https://apni.ru/article/12751-dokazatelstva-v-elektronnoj-forme-v-ugolovnom-processe-zarubezhnyh-stran

Sitdikova, G. Z. (2020). Strategiya adaptivnoy tsifrovizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Strategy of adaptive digitalization of criminal proceedings]. Rule of Law: Theory and Practice, 4-2(62), 213–222.

Smushkin, A. B. (2022). Elektronnaya tsifrovaya informatsiya kak tsentralnyy obyekt elektronnoy tsifrovoy kriminalistiki [Electronic digital information as the central object of digital forensics]. Forensics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 1, 142–154.

Sobirov, Sh. (2023). Tsifrovye dokazatelstva v ugolovnom protsesse: vyzovy, sudebnaya praktika i perspektivy reformirovaniya [Digital evidence in criminal proceedings: Challenges, judicial practice, and prospects for reform]. Society and Innovation, 4(6), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol4-iss6-pp115-127

Sorochin, E. (2026, January 27). Ushcherb ot kiberprestupleniy v Tashkente dostig 2 trln sumov za god [Damage from cybercrime in Tashkent reached 2 trillion soums in one year]. Spot.uz. https://www.spot.uz/ru/2026/01/27/cyber-crime/

Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2012, December 13). Resolution “On Certain Issues of the Application of Legislation on Material Evidence in Criminal Cases” (No. 17). Lex.uz.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2018, August 24). Resolution “On Certain Issues of the Application of the Norms of the Criminal Procedure Law on the Admissibility of Evidence” (No. 24). Lex.uz.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025). Resolution “On Amendments and Supplements to the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated August 24, 2018 No. 24 «On Certain Issues of the Application of the Norms of the Criminal Procedure Law on the Admissibility of Evidence» (No. 14). Lex.uz.

Zhandrov, V. Yu. (2026). Obespechenie dokazatelstvennogo znacheniya tsifrovoy informatsii, poluchaemoy pri provedenii operativno-rozysknykh meropriyatiy [Ensuring the evidentiary value of digital information obtained during operational-search activities]. The Rule of Law: Theory and Practice, 1(83), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2026.1.24

Yuklab Olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2026-07-16

Qanday Iqtibos Keltirish

ISBOTLASH TIZIMIDA RAQAMLI DALILLARDAN FOYDALANISHNING MUAMMOLI JIHATLARI. (2026). YURISPRUDENSIYA, 6(3), 155-164. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/764