RAQAMLI TEXNOLOGIYALARNING SHAXSIY HAYOT DAXLSIZLIGI HUQUQIGA NISBATAN TA’SIRINING NAZARIY TAHLILI
Kalit so‘zlar:
raqamlashtirish, shaxsiy hayot, shaxsiy hayot daxlsizligi, shaxsiy ma’lumotlar, shaxsiy hayotiga aralashishdan himoyalanish, sha’ni va qadr-qimmatiga daxldor ma’lumotlarni ularning roziligisiz oshkor etmaslik, shaxsni tasdiqlovchi ma’lumotlarAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada raqamli texnologiyalarning shaxsiy hayot daxlsizligi huquqiga nisbatan ta’siri nazariy tahlil qilingan. Raqamli texnologiyalarning rivojlanishi hamda jamiyatimiz hayotiga keng joriy qilinishi davlatimizda istiqomat qilayotgan fuqarolarimizning shaxsiy hayoti daxlsizligini ta’minlash borasida ilmiy tadqiqotlar olib borishni taqozo etmoqda. Shu bois shaxsiy hayot daxlsizligi huquqi tushunchasini konseptual, ilmiy-metodologik jihatdan o‘rganish va tahlil etish lozim. Muallifning fikricha, “shaxsiy hayoti haqidagi ma’lumotlarni to‘plash, saqlash, foydalanish”, “yozishmalar, telefonda so‘zlashuvlar, telegraf va boshqa jo‘natmalarni sir saqlash”, “shaxsiy hayotiga aralashishdan himoyalanish”, “sha’ni va qadr-qimmatiga daxldor ma’lumotlarni ularning roziligisiz oshkor etmaslik” kabilarga to‘xtalib o‘tish orqali “shaxsiy hayot daxlsizligi” tushunchasiga mualliflik ta’rifi ishlab chiqish mumkin. Maqolada xorijiy mamlakatlarning ilg‘or tajribasi hamda huquqshunos olimlarning shaxsiy hayot daxlsizligiga oid yondashuvlari tahlil qilingan holda, raqamlashtirish sharoitida shaxsiy hayot daxlsizligi huquqi va uni konstitutsiyaviy-huquqiy tartibga solishning o‘ziga xos xususiyatlari kompleks o‘rganilib, shaxsiy daxlsizlikka oid O‘zbekiston qonunchiligini takomillashtirish bo‘yicha takliflar berilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Gore A. Information Infrastructure Task Force, The National Information Infrastructure: Agenda for Action, 58 Fed. Reg. 49025-01, 1993 WL 365171. 1993, Sept. 21.
2. Tobin J., Field S.M. The Right to Protection of Privacy, Family, Home, Correspondence, Honour, and Reputation. Available at: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780198262657.001.0001/law-9780198262657-chapter-17/.
3. Feijóo C., Gómez-Barroso J.L., Karnitis E. More than twenty years of European policy for the development of the information society. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/netcom/2389?lang=en#article-2389/.
4. Okinawa Charter of Global Information Society. Available at: http://federalbook.ru/files/SVAYZ/saderzhanie/Tom%206/I/hartia.pdf/.
5. Internet World Stats. Available at: http://www.intemetworldstats.com/stats.htm/ (accessed 22.21.2021)).
6. Madiev F. Theoretical basics of the development of the right to privacy: concept and legal nature. Society and Innovation, 2022, vol. 3 (7/S), pp. 184–195. DOI: 10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss7/S-pp184-195/.
7. Makoto I. The Guide to Constitution. Tashkent, p. 127.
8. Kopylov V.A. Informatsionnoye pravo [Information law]. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 2002.
9. Madiev F.K. Constitutional Basis of Ensuring the Right to Privacy in the Age of Informatization. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 2021, no. 11. DOI: 10.47494/mesb.2021.11.657/.
10. Saidov A.X., Turgʻunov M.T., Matchanov A.A. et al. Inson huquqlari umumiy nazariyasi [General Theory of Human Rights]. Academy of Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2012. Available at: https://www.minjust.uz/upload/iblock/0c0/pravo_uz.pdf/.
11. Wacks R. Law, Morality and the Private Domain. Hong Kong University Press, 2000, vol. 1.
12. Kutafin O.Y. Neprikosnovennost’ v konstitutsionnom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Immunity in the constitutional law of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. House, 2014.
13. Houlgate L.D. What is legal intervention in the family? Family law and family privacy. Law & Phil, 1998, vol. 17, p. 141. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3504988/.
14. Weber R.H. Internet of Things - New security and privacy challenges. Computer law & Security Review, 2010, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 23–30. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0267364909001939/.
15. Maleina M.N. Lichnyye neimushchestvennyye prava grazhdan (ponyatiye, osushchestvleniye i zashchita) [Personal non-property rights of citizens (concept, implementation and protection)]. 1997. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15972250/.
16. Chernyavskiy A. G., Grudisyna L.Yu. Prava cheloveka v Rossii [Human rights in Russia]. 2019. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36359442/.
17. Richards N.M. The puzzle of Brandeis, privacy, and speech. Vand. L. Rev., 2010, vol. 63, pp. 1295. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/reader/230476600/.
18. Strahilevitz L.J. Toward a positive theory of privacy law. Harvard Law Review, 2013, vol. 126, no. 7, pp. 2010–2042. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1588&context=law_and_economics/.
19. Madiyev F. Raqamlashtirishning konstitutsiyaviy huquq rivojiga taʼsirining asosiy yoʻnalishlari [The main directions of influence of digitization on the development of constitutional law]. Society and Innovation, 2021, vol. 2, no. 12/S, pp. 72–78.
20. Sadykova A. Garantii okhrany i zashchity personal’nykh dannykh cheloveka i grazhdanina. Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo [Guarantees for the protection and protection of personal data of a person and a citizen]. Constitutional and municipal law, 2007, no. 14, pp. 15–19.
21. Petrykina N.I. K voprosu o konfidentsial’nosti personal’nykhx dannykh [On the issue of confidentiality of personal data]. Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2007, no. 6, pp. 115–122. Available at: https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/lib/27942/1/%D0%9A%20%D0%92%D0%9E%D0%9F%D0%A0%D0%9E%D0%A1%D0%A3%20%D0%9E%20%D0%9F%D0%95%D0%A0%D0%A1%D0%9E%D0%9D%D0%90 %D0%9B%D0%AC%D0%9D%D0%AB%D0%A5%20%D0%94%D0%90%D0%9D%D0%9D%D0%AB%D0%A5%20%D0%9A%D0%90%D0%9A.pdf/.
22. Klimovich Ye.V. O sushchnosti ponyatiya “personal’nyye dannyye” kak konfidentsial’noy informatsii osoboy kategorii [On the essence of the concept of “personal data” as a special category of confidential information]. International Legal Readings, 2005, pp. 21–30.
23. Hartzog W. The Inadequate, Invaluable Fair Information Practices. Md. L. Rev., 2016, vol. 76, p. 952. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3759&context=mlr/.
24. Bygrave L.A. Data protection law. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2002, p. 910.
25. Solove D.J. Understanding privacy. 2008. Available at: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/43383679/Understanding_Privacy-with-cover-page-v2.pdf/.
