HUQUQIY EKSPERIMENTNI O‘TKAZISH BOSQICHLARI: NAZARIY-HUQUQIY TAHLIL
Kalit so‘zlar:
eksperiment, huquqiy eksperiment, norma ijodkorligi, normativ-huquqiy hujjatlar, qonun loyihasi, huquqiy eksperiment subyektlari, mas’ul subyektlar, huquqiy eksperiment bosqichlari, tartibga solish ta’sirini baholashAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada huquqiy eksperiment tushunchasi, uning turlari hamda tasnifi, shuningdek, huquqiy eksperimentni o‘tkazish bosqichlari milliy va xorij tajribasi asosida tahlil qilingan. Jumladan, huquqiy eksperimentni o‘tkazishga tayyorgarlik ko‘rish va o‘tkazishni uch bosqichda amalga oshirish taklif etilgan bo‘lib, eksperiment o‘tkazishga mas’ul bo‘lgan subyektlar doirasi ham milliy qonunchilik asosida yoritilgan. Huquqiy eksperiment o‘tkazilishi davlat siyosatining, islohotlarining tegishli sohalariga ijobiy ta’sir ko‘rsatishi, undan foydalanishga to‘sqinlik qilayotgan muammolar, huquqiy eksperiment ta’rifidan uning samaradorligi va natijadorligini baholashda muhim bo‘lgan asosiy xususiyatlari ajratib ko‘rsatildi. Huquqiy eksperimentning har bir bosqichi mustaqil vazifalar va harakatlar natijalarini aks ettiruvchi hamda mustahkamlovchi muayyan harakatlar va protsessual hujjatlar bilan tavsiflanishi, uning ahamiyati hamda muhimligi asoslantirildi. Maqolada huquqiy eksperiment yuzasidan xulosa va takliflar ilgari surilgan. Huquqiy eksperimentning o‘ziga xos xususiyati uning maxsus ishlab chiqilgan maqsadga qaratilgani bo‘lib, u yoki bu huquqiy gipotezani sun’iy ravishda yaratilgan muhitda tekshirish hamda eksperiment subyektining ijtimoiy munosabatlarni rivojlantirishdagi faol rolini aniqlashdan iborat.
Iqtiboslar
1. Zagaynova G.G. Organy mestnogo samoupravleniya - obyekt dlya konstitutsionno-pravovogo eksperimenta [Local government bodies - an object for a constitutional and legal experiment]. Pravo i praktika – Law and Practice. 2018, no. 4.
2. Alekseev S.S. Pravo. Azbuka. Teoriya. Filosofiya. Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya [Right. ABC. Theory. Philosophy. Experience of complex research]. Moscow, Norma-Infra publ., 1998, p. 18.
3. Makarov I.I. Printsipy provedeniya pravovykh eksperimentov v organizatsii mestnoy vlasti: vzglyady sovetsikh yuristov [Principles of conducting legal experiments in the organization of local authorities: views of Soviet lawyers]. Gosudarstvennaya i munitsipalnaya slujba – State and Municipal service, 2013, no. 1, p. 24.
4. Anokhin Yu. V. Mekhanizm gosudarstvenno-pravovogo obespecheniya prav i svobod lichnosti (na materialax Rossiyskoy Federatsii) [Mechanism of state legal provision of individual rights and freedoms (based on materials of the Russian Federation)]. PhD thesis. Saratov publ., 2007, p. 42.
5. Gestel, van R., Dijck, van G. Better Regulation through Experimental Legislation. European Public Law, 2011, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 539–553.
6. Gubler Z.J. Experimental Rules. Boston College Law Review, 2014, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 129–179.
7. Abramowicz M.B. Randomized Legal Experimentation. GW Law Faculty Publications. Other Works. Paper, 2008, p. 66.
8. Rogers-Dillon R.H. The Welfare Experiments: Politics and Policy Evaluation. Stanford (California), Stanford Law and Politics. 2004, 253 p.
9. Zyablova T. E., Parfenova D. V. O znachenii pravovogo eksperimenta v pravotvorcheskom protsesse [On the importance of legal experiment in the law-making process]. Modern Science, 2021, no. 2-1, pp. 138–143.
10. Osina Ye.S. Pravotvorcheskiy eksperiment kak metod pravotvorcheskoy deyatelnosti [Law-making experiment as a method of law-making activity]. Logika i Metodologiya nauchnыx issledovaniy – Logic and Methodology of Scientific Research, 2020, pp. 88–98.
11. Yujakov V.N., Dobrolyubova Ye.I., Yefremov A.A. Podxody k otsenke rezultativnosti i effektivnosti eksperimentov v gosudarstvennom upravlenii [Approaches to assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of experiments in public administration]. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Pravo – VGU newspaper. Series: Law, 2021, no. 3, pp. 8–26.
12. Yelsov V.N. Pravovoy eksperiment v sovremennoy Rossii: problemy effektivnosti [Legal experiment in modern Russia: problems of efficiency]. PhD thesis, 2009, p. 17.
13. Chervonyuk V. I. Innovatsionnyye yuridicheskiye tekhnologii [Innovative legal technologies]. Yuridicheskaya texnika – Legal technology, 2021, no. 15, pp. 273–293.
14. Heldeweg M. A. Experimental legislation concerning technological & governance innovation–an analytical approach. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 2015, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 169–193.
15. Hlukhenkyi S. Structure of legal experiment as a element of regulation. Innovative Solution in Modern Science, 2021, vol. 8, no. 44, pp. 77–86.
16. Kochetkov A.V., Yelsov V.N. Problemy i sposoby povysheniya effektivnosti pravovogo eksperimenta [Problems and ways to increase the effectiveness of legal experiment]. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya jizn – Legal Policy and Legal Life, 2009, no. 3, pp. 26–29.
17. Ranchordás S. Time, Timing, and Experimental Legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 2015, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 135–139.
18. Calliess C. Towards a European Innovation Principle Endorsed by Better Regulation. Berliner Online-Beitrage zum Europarecht, 2020, 15 p.
