STAGES OF THE LEGAL EXPERIMENT: THEORETICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS

Authors

Keywords:

experiment, legal experiment, rulemaking, normative legal acts, draft law, subjects of legal experiment, responsible subjects, stages of legal experiment, assessment of regulatory impact

Abstract

This article analyzes the concept of legal experiment, its types and classification, as well as the stages of legal experiment on the basis of national and foreign experience. In particular, it is proposed to prepare and conduct a legal experiment in three stages, while the range of subjects responsible for conducting a legal experiment is covered within the framework of national legislation. It was noted that conducting a legal experiment has a positive effect on the relevant area of public policy and reform, but some problems have also been identified that impede the use of a legal experiment. In the definition of a legal experiment, the main characteristics important for evaluating its effectiveness and efficiency are highlighted. The importance of the legal experiment is substantiated since each of its stages is characterized by the fulfillment of certain tasks involving the implementation of specific actions and the consolidation of their results in procedural documents. The peculiarity of the legal experiment is that it is aimed at a specially developed goal, which consists in testing one or another legal hypothesis in an artificially created environment and determining the active role of the subject of the experiment in the development of social relations.

References

1. Zagaynova G.G. Organy mestnogo samoupravleniya - obyekt dlya konstitutsionno-pravovogo eksperimenta [Local government bodies - an object for a constitutional and legal experiment]. Pravo i praktika – Law and Practice. 2018, no. 4.

2. Alekseev S.S. Pravo. Azbuka. Teoriya. Filosofiya. Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya [Right. ABC. Theory. Philosophy. Experience of complex research]. Moscow, Norma-Infra publ., 1998, p. 18.

3. Makarov I.I. Printsipy provedeniya pravovykh eksperimentov v organizatsii mestnoy vlasti: vzglyady sovetsikh yuristov [Principles of conducting legal experiments in the organization of local authorities: views of Soviet lawyers]. Gosudarstvennaya i munitsipalnaya slujba – State and Municipal service, 2013, no. 1, p. 24.

4. Anokhin Yu. V. Mekhanizm gosudarstvenno-pravovogo obespecheniya prav i svobod lichnosti (na materialax Rossiyskoy Federatsii) [Mechanism of state legal provision of individual rights and freedoms (based on materials of the Russian Federation)]. PhD thesis. Saratov publ., 2007, p. 42.

5. Gestel, van R., Dijck, van G. Better Regulation through Experimental Legislation. European Public Law, 2011, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 539–553.

6. Gubler Z.J. Experimental Rules. Boston College Law Review, 2014, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 129–179.

7. Abramowicz M.B. Randomized Legal Experimentation. GW Law Faculty Publications. Other Works. Paper, 2008, p. 66.

8. Rogers-Dillon R.H. The Welfare Experiments: Politics and Policy Evaluation. Stanford (California), Stanford Law and Politics. 2004, 253 p.

9. Zyablova T. E., Parfenova D. V. O znachenii pravovogo eksperimenta v pravotvorcheskom protsesse [On the importance of legal experiment in the law-making process]. Modern Science, 2021, no. 2-1, pp. 138–143.

10. Osina Ye.S. Pravotvorcheskiy eksperiment kak metod pravotvorcheskoy deyatelnosti [Law-making experiment as a method of law-making activity]. Logika i Metodologiya nauchnыx issledovaniy – Logic and Methodology of Scientific Research, 2020, pp. 88–98.

11. Yujakov V.N., Dobrolyubova Ye.I., Yefremov A.A. Podxody k otsenke rezultativnosti i effektivnosti eksperimentov v gosudarstvennom upravlenii [Approaches to assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of experiments in public administration]. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Pravo – VGU newspaper. Series: Law, 2021, no. 3, pp. 8–26.

12. Yelsov V.N. Pravovoy eksperiment v sovremennoy Rossii: problemy effektivnosti [Legal experiment in modern Russia: problems of efficiency]. PhD thesis, 2009, p. 17.

13. Chervonyuk V. I. Innovatsionnyye yuridicheskiye tekhnologii [Innovative legal technologies]. Yuridicheskaya texnika – Legal technology, 2021, no. 15, pp. 273–293.

14. Heldeweg M. A. Experimental legislation concerning technological & governance innovation–an analytical approach. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 2015, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 169–193.

15. Hlukhenkyi S. Structure of legal experiment as a element of regulation. Innovative Solution in Modern Science, 2021, vol. 8, no. 44, pp. 77–86.

16. Kochetkov A.V., Yelsov V.N. Problemy i sposoby povysheniya effektivnosti pravovogo eksperimenta [Problems and ways to increase the effectiveness of legal experiment]. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya jizn – Legal Policy and Legal Life, 2009, no. 3, pp. 26–29.

17. Ranchordás S. Time, Timing, and Experimental Legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 2015, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 135–139.

18. Calliess C. Towards a European Innovation Principle Endorsed by Better Regulation. Berliner Online-Beitrage zum Europarecht, 2020, 15 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

How to Cite

STAGES OF THE LEGAL EXPERIMENT: THEORETICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS. (2026). JURISPRUDENCE, 3(6), 5-16. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/622