MILLIY QONUN HUJJATLARIDA MEDIATSIYA INSTITUTINING UMUMIY TAVSIFI HAMDA USHBU SOHA DOIRASIDA ANIQLANGAN MUAMMOLAR
Kalit so‘zlar:
nizolarni muqobil hal qilish, muqobil yechim, hakamlik, muzokaralar, mediatsiya, mediatorlar, oʻzaro maqbul kelishuvga erishish, mustaqil uchinchi shaxs, kelishuv bitimi, mediativ kelishuv, hakamlik qarori, mediator figurasiAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada milliy qonunchiligimizda mediatsiya institutining umumiy tavsiflari va ushbu sohada aniqlangan muammolar yoritilgan. Mediatsiya institutiga nisbatan milliy va Yevropa huquqshunoslarining qarashlari va tahlillari keltirib oʻtilgan. Shuningdek, maqolada nizolarni muqobil hal etishning boshqa usullari ham keltirib oʻtilgan. Hamda mediatsiya institutining dastlab qaysi mamlakatlarda shakllanganligi va qay usulda ushbu institut rivojlanganligi, shuningdek, bugungi kunda ushbu institutning nizolarni hal qilishda koʻrsatayotgan roli haqida ham tahlillar keltirilgan. Maqolaning keyingi qismida “Mediatsiya” institutining Oʻzbekiston qonunchiligiga kirib kelishi hamda qabul qilingan normativ-huquqiy hujjatlar xronologiyasi tahlil qilingan. Va nizolarni hal qilishda mediatsiyadan foydalanish Oʻzbekistonda fuqarolik jamiyatining rivojlanishiga qanchalik ijobiy taʼsir koʻrsatganligi yoritib berilgan. Mazkur mavzuni tadqiq etish jarayonida sud hujjatlarini ijro etish bosqichida mediatsiya institutini yanada rivojlantirish va takomillashtirish boʻyicha bir qancha huquqshunos olimlarning izlanishlari va takliflarini inobatga olgan holda qator takliflar va tavsiyalar ishlab chiqilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Kucheryavaya N, doctor of legal sciences, professor Law and duty. 2017. Available at: www.huquqburch.uz
2. Mediatorʻs notebook “International Alert” and “For Internationalism” Fund, Bishkek, 2013, 18 p. Available at: www.international-alert.org
3. Konnov A.Yu. Concepts, classifications and basic types of alternative ways of resolving disputes. Journal of Russian Law, 2014, no. 12, December.
4. Masadikov Sh.M. Perspektivy mediatsii kak alternativnogo sposoba razresheniya grajdansko-pravovyx sporovin [Prospects for mediation as an alternative method of resolving civil disputes]. Available at: https://elibrary.ru.
5. Mamasiddikov. M. Is there a need for mediation? Right and Duty. Tashkent, 2017, no. 6 (138). pp. 28–31.
6. National Accreditation Standards for Mediation. 2009, 27 October.
7. Esanova Z.N. Family mediation: issues of applying mediation to the process of compulsory execution of court documents. Proceedings of the republican scientific-practical conference “Issues of further improvement of the field of executive proceedings: harmony of theory and practice”. Tashkent, 2019, pp. 30–37.
8. Nasireva Ye.I. Mediation and implementation of production. Compulsory execution of acts.
9. Dobrolyubova E.A. Mediation kak metod vnesudebnogo razreshenya sporov [Mediation as a method of out-of-court resolution of disputes]. PhD thesis. Moscow, University named after M.V. Lomonosov publ., 2012, 219 p.
10. Rakhmonov. R. Problems of introduction of mediation institution at the pre-trial stage in Uzbekistan. PhD thesis. Tashkent, 2016, 65 p.
11. Kalashnikova S.I. Mediation in the sphere of civil jurisdiction. PhD thesis. 2010, 258 p.
12. Lukyanchikova E.F., Vereshchachi E.A. Primeneniye procedury mediatsii v ipolnitelnom proizvodstve. Belgorod State National Research University, 2017, no. 2 (15), p. 10.
13. Khalmukhamedov K. The importance of mediation in resolving disputes. Bulletin of the Supreme Economic Court, no. 8, 2015.
14. Ivanova M.S. Mediation as a way to protect the rights and interests of spouses during divorce. PhD thesis. Tver State University, 2014, 244 p.
15. Azimov M.K. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Savdo-sanoat palatasi huzuridagi Hakamlik sudi: kecha, bugun [Arbitration Court under the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Republic of Uzbekistan: yesterday, today]. Current issues of the development of arbitration and mediation: a collection of scientific and practical conference materials. Tashkent, 2010, pp. 8–11.
