GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF MEDIATION INSTITUTION IN NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE DOCUMENTS AND IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS IN THIS FIELD
Keywords:
alternative dispute resolution, alternative solution, arbitration, negotiation, mediation, mediators, reaching a mutually acceptable agreement, an independent third party, settlement agreement, mediation agreement, arbitration decision, mediator figureAbstract
This article covers a general description of the institution of mediation in our national legislation and the problems identified in this field. In which countries the mediation institute was first formed and how this institute developed, as well as analyses of the role of this institute in resolving disputes, are presented. In the next part of the article, the entry of the “Mediation” institute into the legislation of Uzbekistan and the chronology of the adopted normative legal documents are analyzed. And how the use of mediation in conflict resolution had a positive effect on the development of civil society in Uzbekistan. This article presents the views and analyses of national and European jurists regarding the institution of mediation. The article also mentions other methods of alternative dispute resolution. In the process of researching this topic, further development and improvement of the institution of mediation at the stage of execution of court documents A number of proposals and recommendations have been developed, taking into account the research and proposals of several legal scholars.
References
1. Kucheryavaya N, doctor of legal sciences, professor Law and duty. 2017. Available at: www.huquqburch.uz
2. Mediatorʻs notebook “International Alert” and “For Internationalism” Fund, Bishkek, 2013, 18 p. Available at: www.international-alert.org
3. Konnov A.Yu. Concepts, classifications and basic types of alternative ways of resolving disputes. Journal of Russian Law, 2014, no. 12, December.
4. Masadikov Sh.M. Perspektivy mediatsii kak alternativnogo sposoba razresheniya grajdansko-pravovyx sporovin [Prospects for mediation as an alternative method of resolving civil disputes]. Available at: https://elibrary.ru.
5. Mamasiddikov. M. Is there a need for mediation? Right and Duty. Tashkent, 2017, no. 6 (138). pp. 28–31.
6. National Accreditation Standards for Mediation. 2009, 27 October.
7. Esanova Z.N. Family mediation: issues of applying mediation to the process of compulsory execution of court documents. Proceedings of the republican scientific-practical conference “Issues of further improvement of the field of executive proceedings: harmony of theory and practice”. Tashkent, 2019, pp. 30–37.
8. Nasireva Ye.I. Mediation and implementation of production. Compulsory execution of acts.
9. Dobrolyubova E.A. Mediation kak metod vnesudebnogo razreshenya sporov [Mediation as a method of out-of-court resolution of disputes]. PhD thesis. Moscow, University named after M.V. Lomonosov publ., 2012, 219 p.
10. Rakhmonov. R. Problems of introduction of mediation institution at the pre-trial stage in Uzbekistan. PhD thesis. Tashkent, 2016, 65 p.
11. Kalashnikova S.I. Mediation in the sphere of civil jurisdiction. PhD thesis. 2010, 258 p.
12. Lukyanchikova E.F., Vereshchachi E.A. Primeneniye procedury mediatsii v ipolnitelnom proizvodstve. Belgorod State National Research University, 2017, no. 2 (15), p. 10.
13. Khalmukhamedov K. The importance of mediation in resolving disputes. Bulletin of the Supreme Economic Court, no. 8, 2015.
14. Ivanova M.S. Mediation as a way to protect the rights and interests of spouses during divorce. PhD thesis. Tver State University, 2014, 244 p.
15. Azimov M.K. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Savdo-sanoat palatasi huzuridagi Hakamlik sudi: kecha, bugun [Arbitration Court under the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Republic of Uzbekistan: yesterday, today]. Current issues of the development of arbitration and mediation: a collection of scientific and practical conference materials. Tashkent, 2010, pp. 8–11.
