IJTIMOIY TARMOQLARDAGI KONTENT ASAR SIFATIDA
Kalit so‘zlar:
ijtimoiy tarmoqlar, kontent, mualliflik huquqi, mualliflik huquqi obyekti, o‘ziga xoslik, ijodkorlik, ijod prezumpsiyasi, sun’iy intellektAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqola raqamli kontentni asar sifatida tan olish shartlarini aniqlashga bag‘ishlangan. Tadqiqot predmeti ijtimoiy tarmoqlardagi kontentning mualliflik huquqi obyekti sifatidagi huquqiy tabiatidir. Ishning maqsadi kontentni huquqiy muhofaza qilishning nazariy mezonlarini ishlab chiqishdan iborat. Dolzarblik ijtimoiy tarmoqlar foydalanuvchilari sonining o‘sishi va raqamli ijodning kengayishi bilan izohlanadi. Ushbu maqolada originallik va ijodkorlikning universal mezonlari yo‘qligi muammosi ko‘rib chiqiladi. Taqqoslash, nazariy tahlil va umumlashtirish usullari asosida minimal ijodiy hissa mavjud bo‘lganda ijod prezumpsiyasini qo‘llash zarurligi ko‘rsatilgan. Tadqiqot natijalariga ko‘ra mualliflik huquqini raqamli muhitga moslashtirish zarurligi haqida xulosa qilingan. Mazkur maqolada olingan natijalar mualliflik huquqi sohasidagi qonunchilik va ilmiy tadqiqotlarda qo‘llanishi mumkin.
Iqtiboslar
Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. (1979, September 28). WIPO Lex – Berne Convention Text
Bossi, L. (2026). Volunteering for the platforms – How social media terms of service may violate the fair remuneration principle of authors and performers. Computer Law & Security Review, 60, Article 106246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106246
Fasel, M., & Weerts, S. (2025). Between regulation, pressure and collaboration: The public-private entanglement in content moderation. Telecommunications Policy, 49(9), Article 103024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103024
Fiala, L., & Husovec, M. (2022). Using experimental evidence to improve delegated enforcement. International Review of Law and Economics, 71, Article 106079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2022.106079
Jackson, C. (2026). Social media growth statistics 2026: What the numbers say about where social is headed. https://seosherpa.com/social-media-growth-statistics/
Kohl, U. (2022). What post-mortem privacy may teach us about privacy. Computer Law & Security Review, 47, Article 105737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105737
Maaß, S., Wortelker, J., & Rott, A. (2024). Evaluating the regulation of social media: An empirical study of the German NetzDG and Facebook. Telecommunications Policy, 48(5), Article 102719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102719
Quintais, J. P. (2025). Generative AI, copyright and the AI Act. Computer Law & Security Review, 56, Article 106107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106107
Quintais, J. P., De Gregorio, G., & Magalhães, J. C. (2023). How platforms govern users’ copyright-protected content: Exploring the power of private ordering and its implications. Computer Law & Security Review, 48, Article 105792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105792
Romero-Moreno, F. (2025). Deepfake detection in generative AI: A legal framework proposal to protect human rights. Computer Law & Security Review, 58, Article 106162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106162
Tillaboyev, S. (2024). The role of copyright in the context of social media. International Journal of Law and Criminology, 4(2), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/Volume04Issue02-10
Weideman, M. (2013). Academic content – A valuable resource to establish your presence on the web. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.036
WIPO Copyright Treaty. (1996, December 20). https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/295166
Xiao, B. (2023). Making the private public: Regulating content moderation under Chinese law. Computer Law & Security Review, 51, Article 105893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105893
Xiao, L. (2025). Illegal loot box advertising on social media? An empirical study using the Meta and TikTok ad transparency repositories. Computer Law & Security Review, 56, Article 106069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106069
Yakubova, I. (2024). The principles of forming collective management of copyright rights. American Journal of Public Diplomacy and International Studies, 2(2), 151–155. https://grnjournal.us/index.php/AJPDIS/article/view/3072
Yuldashov, A. (2022). Copyright protection in telecommunications networks: The example of blockchain technology. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Development, 4, 22–29. https://ejird.journalspark.org/index.php/ejird/article/view/57
Yuklab Olishlar
Nashr qilingan
Son
Bo‘lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 YURISPRUDENSIYA
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ostida litsenziyalangan.
