SANOAT NAMUNALARINI HUQUQIY MUHOFAZA QILISH MUAMMOLARI VA ULARNING DEKORATIV-AMALIY SANʼAT ASARLARI BILAN NISBATI

Mualliflar

Kalit so‘zlar:

sanoat namunasi, intellektual mulk, badiiy-konstruktorlik yechimi, dekorativ-amaliy san’at, patentli muhofaza, mualliflik huquqi, dizayn, sanoat mulki huquqi

Annotatsiya

Ushbu maqola sanoat namunasining sanoat mulki obyekti sifatidagi huquqiy tabiatini tadqiq etish hamda O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Ixtirolar, foydali modellar va sanoat namunalari to‘g‘risida”gi Qonunining 8-moddasini takomillashtirishga bag‘ishlangan. Unda sanoat namunalari bilan dekorativ-amaliy san’at asarlarini chegaralash, shuningdek, vizual dizayn va uning moddiy ifodasi o‘rtasidagi farqni aniqlash muammolari ko‘rib chiqilgan. Sanoat namunasining funksional-estetik xususiyatga ega ikki tomonlama tabiati tadqiq etilgan. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi qonunchiligi hamda xorijiy davlatlarning sanoat namunalarini huquqiy muhofaza qilishga oid yondashuvlari qiyosiy-huquqiy jihatdan tahlil qilingan. Qonunchilikdagi “dizayn” hamda “sanoat yoki hunarmandchilik ishlab chiqarishi” tushunchalarining ta’riflarini kiritish zarurligi asoslab berilgan. Patent huquqi va mualliflik huquqi obyektlarini chegaralash mezonlari taklif etilgan. Shu bilan birga, sanoat namunalarining turlari tizimlashtirilgan hamda mazkur qonunning 8-moddasi yangi tahriri ishlab chiqilgan.

Iqtiboslar

Bezbakh, V. V., & Puchinskiy, V. K. (2004). Grazhdanskoe i torgovoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran [Civil and commercial law of foreign countries]. MTsFER.

Biryukov, A. A. (2017). Pravo intellektualnoy sobstvennosti: Praktikum [Intellectual property law: Practical guide]. Prospekt.

Biryukov, A. A. (2018). Pravo intellektualnoy sobstvennosti v skhemakh [Intellectual property law in diagrams]. Prospekt.

Council of the European Union. (2002). Council Regulation (EC) No. 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 3, 1–24. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32002R0006&utm_source

European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (1998). Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 289, 28–35.

Gorodov, O. A. (2011). Pravo promyshlennoy sobstvennosti [Industrial property law]. Statut.

Oqyulov, O. (2003). Intellektual mulk huquqi: Umumiy qoidalar va alohida obyektlar [Intellectual property law: General provisions and specific objects]. TSIL Publ.

Republic of Uzbekistan. (2002, August 29). On inventions, utility models and industrial designs (Law No. 397-II on amendments and additions ). Lex.uz.

Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024, January 11). Rules for drafting, filing and examination of an application for a patent for an industrial design (Registration No. 3490). Lex.uz.

Revinskiy, O. V. (2020). Pravo promyshlennoy sobstvennosti [Industrial property law] (3rd ed.). Yurservitum.

Sergeev, A. P. (1999). Pravo intellektualnoy sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Intellectual property law in the Russian Federation] (2nd ed.). Prospekt.

Sychev, A. N. (2012). Zashchita intellektualnoy sobstvennosti i patentovedeniye [Intellectual property protection and patent science]. El Kontent.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (1999). Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs. World Intellectual Property Organization.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2019). Looking good: An introduction to industrial designs for small and medium-sized enterprises. World Intellectual Property Organization. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.29085

World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. World Intellectual Property Organization.

Yuklab Olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2026-08-28

Qanday Iqtibos Keltirish

SANOAT NAMUNALARINI HUQUQIY MUHOFAZA QILISH MUAMMOLARI VA ULARNING DEKORATIV-AMALIY SANʼAT ASARLARI BILAN NISBATI. (2026). YURISPRUDENSIYA, 6(4), 93-99. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/783