PROCEDURE FOR SECURING A CLAIM IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
Keywords:
arbitration court, competent court, arbitration proceedings, securing a claim, arbitration, normative legal act, law, codeAbstract
Arbitration courts, in our opinion, are one of the main institutions of civil society. A modern legal state cannot exist and function without a strong civil society. The experience of developed Western countries shows that citizens and entrepreneurs have a very positive attitude towards arbitration courts since arbitration processes are designed to quickly and efficiently resolve disputes and other problems in civil and economic activities. Therefore, in the context of the further deepening of democratic reforms and the formation of civil society in our country, it is extremely necessary to widely develop the institution of arbitration. At the same time, it should be noted that today, in addition to competent courts, various problems arise when considering a number of cases of civil and economic disputes by arbitration courts. This article examines the issue of the procedure for securing a claim in the arbitration process by analyzing foreign experience. The interaction of the arbitration court with the competent (state) courts, the procedure for securing a claim, and shortcomings are also studied. In addition, proposals and recommendations for our national legislation on the procedure for securing a claim are developed.
References
1. Mamasiddiqov M.M., Masadikov Sh.M., Xabibullaev D.Y., Azizov N.A., Salimova I.M. Hakamlik muhokamasi [Arbitration proceedings]. 2016, p. 64.
2. Mohmeded S. A critical analysis of arbitral provisional measures in England and Wales. Brunel University, 2014, p. 45.
3. Shalaan W. Interim Measures in International Commercial Arbitration. A Comparative Study of the Egyptian, English and Scottish Law. University of Stirling, 2013, p. 122.
4. Pisacane G., Murphy L., Zhang C. Arbitration in China. Rules & Perspectives. China Law, Tax & Accounting. Springer Singapore, 2016, p. 21.
5. Arbitration in Slovakia. Available at: https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/ru/arbitration-in-slovakia/.
6. Liu X., Yang L. Redemption of Chinese Arbitration? Comments on the Civil Procedure Law (2012) and Free Trade Zone Arbitration Rules. Chinese Journal of International Law, 2014, no. 4, p. 656.
7. Fuqarolik ishlari boʻyicha sudga murojaat qilish tartibi [Procedure of applying to the court on civil cases]. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. 2016, p. 110.
8. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Hakamlik sudlari to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuniga sharh [Commentary on the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Arbitration Courts”]. Available at: https://nrm.uz/contentf?doc=428849_hakamlik_sudlari_to%E2%80%98g%E2%80%98risidagi_qonunga_sharh&products=1_vse_zakonodatelstvo_uzbekistana/.
9. Ibratova F.B. et al. Legal issues of observation-bankruptcy procedures applicable by the economic court of Uzbekistan. Advanced Res. L. & Econ., Tashkent, 2019, p. 187.
10. Salimova I. Nizolarni hal qilishning muqobil usullari [Alternative dispute resolution methods]. 2022, p. 92.
11. Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: a global commentary on the New York Convention in action 121. More details on such arbitration commissions, also see Lalive, supra note 1, 2016, рр. 667–668.
12. Latham & Watkins. Guide to International Arbitration. USA, 2017, pp. 20–21.
13. Rubino-Sammartano M. International Arbitration Law and Practice. 3rd Ed. London, 2014,
pp. 324–335.
14. Hossain M.M. International Commercial Arbitration: the need for harmonized legal regime on court ordered interim measures of relief. University of Toronto (Canada), ProQuest Dissertations Publ., 2012, p. 10.
15. Dmitriyeva G.K. Mejdunarodny kommercheskiy arbitraj: Uchebno-prakticheskoye posobiye [International Commercial Arbitration: Study Guide]. Moscow, 1997, p. 16.
