Reflection of property rights in the Constitution
Keywords:
constitution, person, citizen, property, right, inviolability, possession, use, disposal, guaranteeAbstract
The Constitution is the main law of our country. The constitution must reflect the right to property and guarantee the inviolability of the property of a person and a citizen. These guarantees, in turn, should be clearly valid and enforceable, and should not be subject to varying interpretations by the implementers. It is these guarantees that increase the trust of a person and citizens in the constitution, laws, and the state. Property rights must be guaranteed by law. In the ongoing constitutional reforms in Uzbekistan, one of the priority tasks is the improvement of constitutional norms relating to the right to property and its provision. In this regard, it seems appropriate to study the scientific and practical aspects of enshrining the norm in the constitution that the inviolability of property can only be violated by alienation by the owner with the preliminary payment of a full and fair price by a court decision. In addition, it is important to express in the constitution the provisions that a thing belonging to a citizen imposes on him not only rights but also certain duties, under which the owner must perform all actions for the benefit of the society using the property. It is also necessary to strengthen the protection of private property, while it is necessary to establish rules regarding the protection and guarantee of private property by law and not by the state.
References
1. Oʻzbek tilining izohli lugʻati. “M” harfi [An explanatory dictionary of the Uzbek language. The letter “M”]. Available at: https://ziyouz.uz/durdona-toplamlar/uzbek-tilining-izohli-lugati/.
2. Navoiy A. Tarixi muluki ajam. Available at: https://e-tarix.uz/milliyat-insholari/621-navoiy.html/.
3. Saidov A.Kh. Pravo sobstvennosti v Respublike Uzbekistan [Ownership in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 12 (120), pp. 66–81. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravo-sobstvennosti-v-respublike-uzbekistan/.
4. Render M.M. The concept of property. University of Pittsburgh law review, 2017, Summer, vol. 78, pp. 439–492.
5. Carpenter K., Katyal S., Riley A. In defense of property. Yale Law Journal, 2009, no. 18, pp. 1022–1125.
6. Hart H.L.A.. The concept of law. 3rd ed. Oxford, England, Clarendon Press, 2012. Original work publ. 1961.
7. Claeys E.R. Use and the function of property. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 2018,
no. 63 (2), pp. 221–258.
8. Zambon A. Property: a conceptual analysis. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/revus/5208#ftn11/.
9. Morriss A. The economics of property rights. 2007, March. Available at: http://www.thefreemanonline.org/features/the-economics-of-property-rights/.
10. Osnovnoy zakon Federativnoy Respubliki Germanii. [Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Federal Republic of Germany. Constitution and legislative acts. Ed. Yu.P.Uryasa. Munchen, Progress, 1991.
11. Baur J., Stürner R. Sachenrecht [Property law]. Munchen, 2009, p. 393.
12. Konstitutsiya Respubliki Polshi [Constitution of the Republic of Poland]. Available at: https://legalns.com/download/books/cons/poland.pdf/.
13. Konstitutsiya Shveytsarii [Constitution of Switzerland]. Available at:https://legalns.com/download/books/cons/switzerland.pdf/.
14. Konstitutsiya Korolevstva Niderlandov [Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands]. Available at: https://legalns.com/download/books/cons/netherlands.pdf/.
15. Konstitutsiya Finlyandii [Constitution of Finland]. Available at:https://legalns.com/download/books/cons/finland.pdf/.
16. Imomov N.F. Yuridik shaxs mohiyatining fuqarolik-huquqiy talqini (nazariy masalalar) [Civil-legal interpretation of the essence of a legal entity (theoretical issues)]. Tashkent, TSUL, 2017, p. 150.
17. Konstitutsiya RF s izmeneniyami 2022 goda [The Constitution of the Russian Federation as amended in 2022]. Available at:http://duma.gov.ru/news/55446/.
18. Konstitutsiya Respubliki Kazakhstan [Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at:https://www.akorda.kz/ru/official_documents/constitution/.
19. Konstitutsiya Azerbaydzhanskoy Respubliki [Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan]. Available at:https://mincom.gov.az/ru/view/pages/13/.
20. Semenov Yu.I. Ekonomika kak bazis obshhestva: obshhiy kategorial’nyy apparat [Economy as the basis of society: general categorical apparatus]. Philosophy and society, 2014, no. 1, p. 73.
21. Brożek B. On tû-tû. Revu. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law, 2015, no. 27, pp. 15–23. DOI: 10.4000/revus.3426/.
22. Sukhanov Ye.A. Pravo sobstvennosti v sovremennoy Rossii: neskol’ko printsipial’nykh tezisov [Ownership in modern Russia: a few fundamental theses]. Russia and the Modern World, no. 3, 2001, pp. 102–108. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravo-sobstvennosti-v-sovremennoy-rossii-neskolko-printsipialnyh-tezisov/.
23. Baratov M.X. Fuqarolik-huquqiy munosabatlarda davlat ishtirokining nazariy va amaliy muammolari [Theoretical and practical problems of state participation in civil-legal relations]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, 2008, p. 38.
24. Bell A., Parchomovsky G. A theory of property. Cornell L. Rev., 2005, vol. 90, pp. 531–531.
25. Merrill T.W., Smith H.E. Optimal standardization in the law of property: the numerus clausus principle. Yale L.J., vol. 110, no. 1, p. 200.
26. Davidson N.M. Standardization and pluralism in property law. Vand. L. Rev., 2008, vol. 61,
pp. 1597–1598.
27. Dukeminier J., Krier J.E., Alexander G.S., Schill M.H. Property. 2010, p. 197.
