RELEVANCE OF CIVIL CASES: THEORETICAL RULES AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS
Keywords:
jurisdiction, civil case, dispute, undisputed case, administrative procedure, authority, court, extrajudicial procedure, arbitration, mediation, authority, institutions, notaryAbstract
This article is devoted to the topic of subordination, which is one of the oldest and most relevant institutions of civil procedural law, the content of this topic includes which body is competent to consider disputes (cases), its criteria and conditions, as well as the limits of the competence of the court and other bodies in this area. The task of subordination in a broad sense determines the forms of protection (judicial or extrajudicial resolution) of the rights and interests of individuals (individuals and legal entities).In a narrow sense, it is understood to belong to a number of state bodies and organizations empowered to protect the violated and disputed subjective rights of individuals and legal entities and their legally protected interests. The subordination of cases plays a key role in delineating their powers from each other. The article also includes aspects of subordination, which is a broad concept in relation to jurisdiction, and similarities and differences with this procedural institution. At the same time, the article provides detailed information and analysis of several types of subordination in civil procedural law, including alternative, contractual, imperative, and exceptional types. At the end of the article, problems related to the topic of subordination, suggestions and recommendations for their solution, and the author’s conclusions are presented.
References
1. Yodgorov X. Fuqarolik ishlari boʻyicha sudga murojaat qilish tartibi [The procedure for applying to the court on civil cases]. Tashkent, Baktria press Publ., 2016, 224 p.
2. Mualliflar jamoasi. Fuqarolik protsessual huquqi [Civil procedural law]. Tashkent, Lesson press Publ., 2020, 232 p.
3. Esanova Z. Fuqarolik protsessual huquqi [Civil procedural law]. General part. Tashkent, Yuridik adabiyotlar Publ., 2022, 328 p.
4. Mualliflar jamoasi. Fuqarolik protsessual huquqi [Civil procedural law]. Ed. M.M. Mamasiddikov. Tashkent, Adolat Publ., 2022, 572 p.
5 Salimova I.M. Iqtisodiy nizolarning taalluqliligi (nazariy-huquqiy va protsessual jihatlari) [Relevance of economic disputes (theoretical-legal and procedural aspects)]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSUL, 2020, p. 49.
6. Esanova Z.N. Fuqarolik ishlarining sudlovliligi: nazariy qoidalar va ilmiy-amaliy tahlil [Judiciality of civil cases: theoretical rules and scientific-practical analysis]. Scientific Impulse, 2022, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 322–327.
7. Esanova Z. Rarticipants of executive production: theoretical rules and analytical results. Review of Law Sciences, 2020, Tashkent, no. 2, pp. 33–38.
8. Esanova Z.N. Proizvodstvo po delam, svyazannym s resheniyem treteyskogo suda i ispolneniye sudebnykh opredeleniy po delu (pri analize zakonodatel’stva Respubliki Uzbekistan) [Proceedings in cases related to the decision of the arbitration court and the execution of court rulings on the case (when analyzing the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan)]. 2020, pp. 43–47.
9. Esanova Z. N. Possibilities of using information and communication tools in civil proceedings: the experience of Uzbekistan. Models and Methods in Modern Science, Tashkent, 2022, no. 8, pp. 135–140.
10. Esanova Z. Rol’ mediatsii v razreshenii sporov i pravoprimenenii (analiz otechestvennogo i zarubezhnogo opyta) [The Role of Mediation in Dispute Resolution and Law Enforcement (Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Experience)]. Obzor zakonodatel’stva Uzbekistana – Review of the Legislation of Uzbekistan, 2019, no. 3, pp. 38–41.
11. Tursunov A., Ergashev Z. Dal’neysheye povysheniye roli instituta mediatsii v razreshenii sporov: zarubezhnyy opyt [Further enhancement of the role of mediation in dispute resolution: foreign experience]. Aktual’nyye voprosy i perspektivy tsifrovizatsii sudebno-pravovoy deyatel’nosti – Actual Issues and Prospects for the Ciphering of Judicial and Legal Activities. 2022, Tashkent, no. 1,
pp. 124–130.
12. Rustambekov I. Sushhnost’ i osobennosti mediatsii [Essence and features of mediation]. Obzor zakonodatel’stva Uzbekistana – Review of the Legislation of Uzbekistan, 2019, no. 1, pp. 84–86.
13. Ismailova R.Sh. Osobennosti formirovaniya v Uzbekistane instituta mediatsii v kachestve vnesudebnogo poryadka uregulirovaniya spora [Features of the formation of the institution of mediation in Uzbekistan as an out-of-court procedure for resolving a dispute]. Moscow Journal of International Law, 2020, no. 1, pp. 123–132.
14. Mamasiddiqov M.M. Fuqarolik protsessi [Civil procedure]. 2nd ed. with additions and changes. Tashkent, Noshirlik yogdusi Publ., 2017, 480 p.
15. Mamasiddiqov M.M., Mirzayev U. Buyruq tartibida ish yuritish [Work in order]. Tashkent, Adabiyot uchqunlari Publ., 2015, 204 p.
16. Mamasiddiqov M.M., Yodgorov X.B., Davletov Oʻ.M. Fuqarolik protsessual huquqi [Civil procedural law]. General part. Tashkent, Military-technical institute of the National Guard of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2018, 400 p.
