HISTORY OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
Keywords:
prosecution, law, freedom, victim, accused, justice, court, criminal cases, simplification, criminal process, dignity, law and order, sentenceAbstract
This article will consider the history of domestic and foreign Criminal procedural legislation and the peculiarities of conducting criminal cases in a simplified manner. Strategic steps are being taken in the new Uzbekistan to ensure the rule of law, reform the judicial and legal systems, and protect the rights and interests of citizens, who are an actual link to reforms. This provision is also enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan, which entered into force on May 1 of this year. As the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Sh.M.Mirziyoyev stressed, the updated Constitution should create a solid legal basis and a reliable guarantee of the long-term development strategies of the country and the future well-being of the country and the people as a whole. This article also examines the views and opinions of some legal scholars on the principle of challenge, one of the basic principles of Criminal procedure law, a new institution that is being used with great success today, some aspects of the application of the institute of admission of guilt to the national criminal process, which is a vivid example of simplified criminal proceedings, office work in the first instance, appeals and cassation, record-keeping in repeated cassation, etc., and simplification of criminal proceedings.
References
1. What changes did Shavkat Mirziyoyev propose to the Constitution? Available at: https://www.gazeta.uz/uz/2022/06/21/president-suggestions/
2. Toʻlaganova G.Z. Aybga iqrorlik va protsessual majburlov choralari oʻrtasidagi munosabatlar [The relationship between guilty pleas and procedural coercion]. Proceedings of the scientific-theoretical conference. Tashkent, TSIL, 2006, p. 39.
3. Nizomov F. Adolat gʻoyasi [The idea of justice]. Life and Law, 2004, no. 1, p. 77.
4. Inogʻomjonova Z.F. Sud hukmiga qoʻyilgan talablar [Requirements for a court verdict]. 1994, no. 4, p. 34.
5. Oliy sudning 2023-yil 16-martdagi 07/13-3378-121-son statistika maʼlumotlari [Statistical data of the Supreme Court dated March 16, 2023 No. 07/13-3378-121].
6. V mire kazhdyy chas sovershayetsya okolo 200 tysyach prestupleniy [About 200 thousand crimes are committed in the world every hour]. 2004, April 14. Available at: https://www.newsru.com/crime/14apr2004/crime.html/
7. Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Odil sudlovni taʼminlash va korrupsiyaga qarshi kurashish borasidagi vazifalar muhokamasiga bagʻishlangan videoselektor yigʻilishi materiallari [Materials of the meeting of video selectors dedicated to the discussion of the tasks of ensuring justice and fighting corruption]. 2020, June 30. Available at: https://www.gazeta.uz/uz/2020/06/30/justice/
8. Abdumajidov Gʻ.A. Adolat, javobgarlik, jazo [Justice, responsibility, punishment]. Hayot va qonun – Life and Law, 1999, no. 4, pp. 5–9.
9. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti Shavkat Mirziyoyevning Oliy Majlisga Murojaatnomasi [Address of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev to the Oliy Majlis]. 2020, January 25. Available at: https://uza.uz/uz/posts/zbekiston-respublikasi-prezidenti-shavkat-mirziyeevning-oliy-25-01-2020/
10. Inogʻomjonova Z.F. Hukm, ajrim va qarorlarning qonuniyligi, asosliligi va adolatliligini tekshirishda sud nazorati [Judicial control in checking the legality, reasonableness and fairness of verdicts, rulings and decisions]. Tashkent, TSIL, 2006, p. 11.
11. Toʻlaganova G.Z. Tortishuv tamoyilining dastlabki tergov bosqichiga tatbiq etilishi [Application of the adversarial principle to the preliminary investigation stage]. Tashkent, TSIL, 2005, p. 18.
12. Kayumov A.S. Dobrovol’nyy otkaz ot soversheniya prestupleniya i deyatel’noye raskayaniye po ugolovnomu zakonodatel’stvu Respubliki Uzbekistan [Voluntary dismissal of the criminal offense of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, 1999, 24 p.
13. Inogʻomjonova Z.F. Jinoyat-protsessual qonunchilikni liberallashtirish – davr talabi [Liberalization of criminal-procedural legislation is the demand of the times]. Judicial reform: materials of the international scientific and practical conference on theoretical and practical topics. Tashkent, TSIL, 2001, p. 62.
14. Poʻlatov B. Yarashuv institutining istiqbollari [Prospects for the Institute of Reconciliation]. Improving the Institution of Reconciliation: Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the roundtable discussion. Tashkent, TSIL, 2005, p. 7.
15. Saxaddinov S. Konstitutsiya va Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi jinoyat-protsessual qonunchiligida yarashuv institutining shakllanishi [Formation of the institution of reconciliation in the constitution and criminal procedural legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Actual problems of ensuring the independence of the judiciary in the stage of democratic renewal of the state and society. Proceedings of the scientific-practical conference. Tashkent, TSIL, 2002, pp. 282–294.
