ENSURING EQUAL PROCEDURAL OPPORTUNITIES OF THE PARTIES IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AS AN IMPORTANT CONDITION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF ADVERSARY

Authors

Keywords:

dispute, truth-finding, court, prosecution, defense, proof, equality

Abstract

This article discusses the issues of strengthening the mutual competitiveness of the parties in criminal proceedings, ensuring equality of procedural capabilities of the parties, which is an important component, as well as determining the position of the court in legal proceedings. The process of establishing the truth, determining the level of its activity during the period of collecting, verifying and evaluating evidence, the experience of some developed foreign countries and analysis were carried out on the basis of the scientific views of procedural scientists who conducted scientific research on this problem. The article also discusses the specific role of the judicial investigation stage when considering criminal cases in a court hearing of the first instance, as well as issues of improving the judicial investigation process based on the arguments of the parties. The article also analyzes the experience of foreign countries in developing the stage of judicial investigation in criminal proceedings. The opinions of procedural scientists from foreign countries on increasing the role of the court in the process of proof, the results of research conducted in practice, and the uniqueness of the principle of dispute in a judicial investigation are described. At the same time, recommendations and proposals for amending the criminal procedural legislation regarding improving the stage of judicial investigation when considering a criminal case were discussed.

References

1. Muxitdinov F.M. Jinoyat-protsessual shakl: Nazariy va metodologik muammolar [Criminal-procedural form: Theoretical and methodological problems]. PhD thesis. Tashkent, TSIL publ., 2005, 60 p.

2. Bagdasarov R.V. Printsip sostyazatelnosti v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii i stran Yevropeyskogo Soyuza [The principle of adversarialism in criminal proceedings in Russia and the countries of the European Union]. Moscow, Yurlitinform publ., 2008, 216 p. Available at: https://mgimo.ru/upload/iblock/493/49327214e64d8ed355874959f95c0663.pdf

3. Abbasova F.M. Teoreticheskiye i prakticheskiye problemy osushhestvleniya printsipa sostyazatelnosti v ugolovno-protsessualnom zakonodatelstve Azerbaydjanskoy Respubliki [The theoretical and practical problem of the establishment of principles of social law in the legal and procedural law of the Republic of Azerbaijan]. PhD thesis. Baku, 2011.

4. Criminal-Procedural Code of the Republic of Moldova dated 14 times in 2003 No. 122-XV. Available at: https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30397729#pos=3760;-31

5. Ugolovno-protsessualniy kodeks Respubliki Kazaxstan [Criminal procedural code of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575852&doc_id2=31575852#pos=3;-103.10227966308594&pos2=1005;-60.10227966308594

6. Ugolovno-protsessualniy kodeks Respubliki Kirgizii [Criminal procedural code of the Republic of Kyrgyzstan]. Available at: http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/111530

7. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Adopted resolution 217 A (III) of the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1948. Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/declhr.shtml

8. Human Rights Committee: No. 32 general comments, paragraph 13. Available at: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Criminal-Process-in-Uzbekistan-Interactive.pdf

9. Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (with amendments and additions as of 01/01/2024). Available at: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575852&doc_id2=31575852#activate_doc=2&pos=1017;-79.10227966308594&pos2=1005;-39.10227966308594

10. Ugolovno-protsessualniy kodeks Respubliki Kirgizii [Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kyrgyzstan]. Available at: http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/112308

11. Ugolovno-protsessualniy kodeks Respubliki Moldova ot 14 marta 2003 goda № 122-XV [Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Moldova dated March 14, 2003 No. 122-ХВ]. Available at: https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30397729#pos=1075;-59

12. Ugolovno-protsessualniy kodeks Gruzii [Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia]. Available at: https://www.matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/download/90034/37/ru/pdf

13. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Adopt by resolution 2200 A (CSI) of the General Assembly of December 16, 1966. Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/pactpol.shtml

14. Popova I.P., Smirnova I.G. Zaochnoye sudebnoye razbiratelstvo po ugolovnim delam: problemy realizatsii v kontekste sravnitelno-pravovogo issledovaniya [Trial in absentia in criminal cases: problems of implementation in the context of comparative legal research]. Vestnik. Volga State university. 2018, no. 431. Available at:: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zaochnoe-sudebnoe-razbiratelstvo-po-ugolovnym-delam- problemy-realizatsii-v-kontekste-sravnitelno-pravovogo-issledovaniya. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-postanovleniya-zaochnogo-prigovora

15. Ribinskaya Ye.T. Sostyazatelnost rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri rassmotrenii del v sude pervoy instansii [The adversarial nature of Russian criminal proceedings when considering cases in the court of first instance]. PhD thesis. Irkutsk, 2008, p. 8. Available at: https://static.freereferats.ru/_avtoreferats/01004153828.pdf?ver=8

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

How to Cite

ENSURING EQUAL PROCEDURAL OPPORTUNITIES OF THE PARTIES IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AS AN IMPORTANT CONDITION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF ADVERSARY. (2026). JURISPRUDENCE, 3(6), 93-99. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/638