CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ITS IMPORTANCE

Authors

Keywords:

Constitution, intellectual property, absolute rights, creative freedom, industrial property, proprietary approach, common law

Abstract

This article analyzes intellectual property, its constitutional protection and development trends in this regard in the world constitutionalism. The history of the dynamics of intellectual property rights development is also considered. According to the author, the state, since it establishes the protection of intellectual property by law at the constitutional level, assumes a number of obligations in this area. At the same time, views were expressed on how the modern process of globalization affects the national legislation of countries. Examples of issues to be studied scientifically and theoretically in the field of intellectual property law were given. Ways of intellectual property expression in constitutions and laws of foreign countries have been studied. Examples of approaches of legal scholars to this issue are given and the author’s position is stated. According to the author’s opinion, since in modern post-industrial society the economy is called “intellectual economy” or “knowledge economy”, any modern country should be able to feel the challenges of this. On this basis, the expression of the concept of “intellectual property” in the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan can be assessed as a worthy response to these calls. In its turn, this intellectual property cannot but serve to stimulate tangible income from an intangible object. In particular, it can create grounds for increased attention to its commercialization.

References

1. Kommercializacija intellektual’noj sobstvennosti / V. I. Muhopad. – M.: Magistr: INFRA=M, 2010. – 512 c.

2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston, 2023.

3. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi. «Xalq so‘zi» gazetasi, 1992-yil 15-dekabr, 243 (494)-son.

4. Okyulov Omonboy. Ijodkor muallifning ish beruvchi yoki buyurtmachi bilan oʻzaro munosabatlarida mualliflik huquqlari ustuvorligini huquqiy taʼminlash masalalari. Yurisprudensiya, 2023-yil 1-son. 53-62-betlar. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.51788/tsul.jurisprudence.3.1./EJIG1142

5. “O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi to‘g‘risida”gi Konstitutsiyaviy qonun loyihasi. “Xalq so‘zi”, 2023-yil 15-mart.

6. Kurbanov R.A., Shvedkova O.V., Beljalova A.M. Istorija stanovlenija i razvitija prava promyshlennoj sobstvennosti // Jekonomika. Pravo. Obshhestvo. 2015. № 4. S. 13–23.

7. Laptev G.A. Vozniknovenie i jevoljucija instituta promyshlennoj sobstvennosti. 2012 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://superinf.ru/view_helpstud. php?id=3198

8. Gacolaeva A.H. Nekotorye voprosy opredelenija konstitucionnogo prava intellektual’noj sobstvennosti // Vestnik IKIAT. 2013. № 2 (27).

9. Degtereva V., Zaytsev A., Dmitriev N. The development of the mathematical apparatus for calculation of the intellectual rent industrial enterprises to achieve innovation leadership // VI International Conference «Social, Economic, and Academic Leadership» (ICSEAL 2019). Czech Republic, Prague, 2019.

10. Polavskaja N.V. Intellektual’naja sobstvennost’ kak ob#ekt jekonomicheskih otnoshenij // Kreativnaja jekonomika. 2014. № 8 (92). S. 22–32

11. Prudentov R.V. Metod pravovogo regulirovanija: voprosy teorii i konstitucionnogo prava. M.: Statut, 2019. 192 c.

12. Dozorcev V.A. Ponjatie iskljuchitel’nogo prava // Juridicheskij mir. 2000. № 3–6. S. 4–9.

13. N.D. Dmitriev, P.Ju. Ermoshin. Konstitucionno-pravovye osnovy intellektual’noj sobstvennosti // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2021, № 1, s. 85-93

14. Intellektual’naja sobstvennost’ pod ohranoj zakona : monografija / T. L. Kalacheva, O. P. Popova. – Habarovsk : Izd-vo Tihookean. gos. un-ta, 2018. – 210 s.

15. Avdeeva V. P. Problemy konstitucionno-pravovogo obespechenija svobody tvorchestva i ohrany intellektual’noj sobstvennosti v Rossijskoj Federacii: dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Tjumen’, 2009.

16. Pavlov E. A. Konstitucionno-pravovaja ohrana i zashhita imushhestvennyh prav i interesov predprinimatelja. Analiz osnovnyh ponjatij // Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 3. S. 65–67.

17. O‘zbekistonda intellektual mulk himoyasi va uni tijoratlashtirish. Shohjahon Xo‘jayev bilan intervyu // URL: https://kun.uz/news/2022/08/13/ozbekistonda-intellektual-mulk-himoyasi-va-uni-tijoratlashtirish-shohjahon-xojayev-bilan-intervyu

18. Usov G.V. Konstitucionno-pravovaja zashhita intellektual’noj sobstvennosti v Rossii i zarubezhnyh stranah (sravnitel’no-pravovoe issledovanie): Dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2015. 201 s.

19. Volos A.A. Sovremennye tendencii razvitija predstavlenij o principah grazhdanskogo prava // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2016. № 2. S. 20–23.

20. Holgersson M., Aaboen L. A literature review of intellectual property management in technology transfer offices: From appropriation to utilization // Technology in Society. 2019. № 59.

21. Seleksiya yutugʻi uchun patent 10 kunda rasmiylashtiriladi // URL: https://www.norma.uz/oz/qonunchilikda_yangi/selekciya_yutugi_uchun_patent_10_kunda_rasmiylashtiriladi

22. Sudakova N.E. Osmyslenie mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava kak sociokul’turnogo fenomena v kontekste stanovlenija sovremennoj lichnosti // Vyzovy global’nogo mira. Vestnik IMTP. 2014. № 1. S. 140–144.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

How to Cite

CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ITS IMPORTANCE. (2026). JURISPRUDENCE, 3(Maxsus I), 46-56. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/650