IMPROVING THE ANTI-CORRUPTION EXPERTISE OF PROJECTS FOR THE ADOPTION OF DIRECT-ACTION LAWS
Keywords:
normative legal acts, anti-corruption expertise, direct action, legislative technique, judicial bodies, rulemakingAbstract
In the Republic of Uzbekistan, measures are being taken to strengthen the legislative process and adopt direct legal acts. The direct effect of the law as a form of exercising the right is the property of the legal norms enshrined in the law to have (without any acts specifying them) a direct regulatory effect on everyone to whom they are addressed, as well as the associated opportunity for citizens to demand protection (provision) of their rights, referring only to these provisions of the law. Unfortunately, the effective practice of adopting laws of direct effect is not effective, which is due to various reasons. This article critically analyzed the procedure and mechanism for conducting anti-corruption expertise of draft laws to ensure the adoption of laws of direct effect. The main purpose of the article is to analyze the criteria for evaluating the project during the examination. The statistical, comparative-legal method and the method of generalization of scientific research of scientists were used as research methods. Taking into account the analysis, it was revealed the need to comprehend the theoretical and practical foundations of the Institute of anti-corruption expertise in the Republic of Uzbekistan in order to improve the procedure for the adoption of laws of direct effect. Based on the results of the study, conclusions were drawn regarding the improvement of the effectiveness of anti-corruption expertise. These proposals can be used in the development of relevant draft regulations, strategic documents for the development and further reform of the Institute of anti-corruption expertise. The findings of the study can be used in lawmaking activities.
References
1. The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated December 8, 1992. Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/4032775/.
2. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated January 7, 1997 № LRU–682 «On normative legal acts». Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/5695915/.
3. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated February 7, 2017 № DP–4947 «On the Strategy of Actions for the further development of the Republic of Uzbekistan». Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/3107042/.
4. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated January 28, 2022 № DP–60 «On the Development Strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022–2026». Available at: https://lex.uz/ru/docs/5841077/.
5. Order of minister of justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan «On approval of the regulation on the procedure for conducting anti-corruption expertise of normative legal acts and their drafts», registered 24.02.2021, reg. number 3287. Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/5398364/.
6. Abdusattarov T. Huquqiy ekspertiza tushunchasi va mohiyati. Qonunchilik hujjatlarini ekspertiza qilish muammolari. Ilmiy-amaliy seminar materiallari . Ed. F. Otahonov. T., TSIL, 2005, рр. 42-46.
7. Najimov M.K., Saydullayev Sh.A. Qonunchilik texnikasi. O‘quv qo‘llanma. Qayta ishlangan va to‘ldirilgan 2-nashr. T.: TDYI, 2009. 280 b.
8. Saidov A.X. Ko‘chimov Sh.N. Qonunchilik texnikasi asoslari. Toshkent: Adolat, 2001. 279 b.
9. Xaitbayev M. Qonun hujjatlari loyihalarini huquqiy ekspertizadan o‘tkazishdagi ayrim muammolar. Qonunchilik hujjatlarini ekspertiza qilish muammolari. Ilmiy-amaliy seminar materiallari. T.: TDYI, 2005. B. 53-55.
10. Xayitov X.S. Qonun ijodkorligida yuridik-lingvistik ekspertiza o‘tkazishning tashkiliy va huquqiy masalalari. Toshkent: TDYI, 2012, 138 b.
11. Xalilov E.H. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining qonun chiqaruvchi oliy organi: sohta vakillikdan haqiqiy parlamentarizmga qadar. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston, 2001. 384 b.
12. Vogenauer S. Learning and lawmaking in Germany today. // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 26, No. 4, Winter, 2006. pp. 627-663. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4494561/.
13. Snyder F. The Effectiveness of European Community Law: Institutions, Processes, Tools and Techniques. The Modern Law Review, vol. 56, no. 1 (Jan., 1993), pp. 19-54. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/109657/.
14. Flack H.E. Scientific Assistance in Law Making. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, Vol. 10, Tenth Annual Meeting (1913), pp. 215-221. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3038428/.
15. International Scientific Conference: The Quality of Legal Acts and its Importance in Contemporary Legal Space. 4-5 October, 2012. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/.
