THEORETICAL AND COMPARATIVE-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF APPEALS BY CITIZENS AND LEGAL ENTITIES TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
Keywords:
indirect constitutional appeal, direct constitutional appeal, explicit (concrete) appeal, abstract appeal, normative constitutional appeal, preliminary requests, actio popularis, quasi popularis, amparoAbstract
This article theoretically studies the issues related to individual appeals to the constitutional judicial bodies, and comparatively analyzes the types of individual constitutional appeals in foreign countries. There are direct and indirect manifestations of individual constitutional appeals, and the article analyzes several types of the above-mentioned manifestations of appeals of citizens and legal entities to the constitutional judicial body. In countries where the types of individual constitutional appeals are theoretically disclosed and centralized or scattered constitutional control is established, the level of effectiveness of individual constitutional appeals and the shortcomings of the types of appeals are analyzed in detail. In addition, the article theoretically reveals in which types of individual constitutional appeals the fundamental rights of citizens and legal entities are effectively protected and restored by the constitutional judicial body. It also provides a comparative and legal analysis of what types of individual constitutional appeals work best in countries with the same type of constitutional control, and in what forms the rights and interests of citizens and legal entities continue to be violated. At the end of the article there is a conclusion on the theoretical and comparative-legal analysis.
References
1. Kosimov B., 2020. Verxovenstvo prava i pandemiya koronavirusa COVID-19. Review of law sciences, (2), pp. 64-68.
2. Kosimov, B., 2020. Threats to judicial independence: reflections on the US experience. TSUL Legal Report International electronic scientific journal, no. 1 (1).
3. Harutyunyan, G., Nussberger, A. and Paczolay, P., 2009. Study on Individual Access To Constitutional Justice. Venice Commission [European Commission for Democracy Through Law], 538,
pp. 1-172.
4. Martin C.H., 2004. Comparative Human Rights Jurisprudence in Azerbaijan: Theory, Practice and Prospects. J. Transnat’l L. & Pol’y, 14, p.215.
5. Bericht des Schweizerischen Bundesgericht für die VII. Konferenz der europäischen Verfassungsgerichte, p. 17. Available at: http:// www.confcoconsteu.org/reports/Zwitserland-DE.pdf, (accessed 02.06.2009).
6. Harutyunyan G., Nussberger, A. and Paczolay, P., 2009. Study on Individual Access To Constitutional Justice. Venice Commission [European Commission for Democracy Through Law], 538, pp. 1-172.
7. Inson huquqlari bо‘yicha milliy institutlar tо‘g‘risida”gi Parij tamoyillariga kо‘ra, BMT Bosh Assambleyasining 48/134-sonli qarori, 20.12.1993.
8. G. Kucsko-Stadlmayer, “The Competences of European Ombudspersons – Description and Analysis of the Status Quo. Available at: http://www.ioi-europe.org/index2.html.
9. Van Aaken, A., 2006. Making International Human Rights Protection. In Conferences on new political economy (Vol. 23, p. 29). Mohr Siebeck.
10. Brunner, G., 2002. Der Zugang des Einzelnen zur Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit im europäischen Raum.
11. Czarnota A., 2007. Rights before courts: A study of constitutional courts in postcommunist states of Central and Eastern Europe.
12. Kelsen Н. Le contrôle de la constitutionnalité des lois: quelle procédure?. Actes du colloque international L’effectivité des droits fondamentaux dans les pays de la communauté francophone [The contradictory nature of the Constitution: the law of the Community]. Port-Louis (Île Maurice), 29-30 septembre, 1er octobre 1993, p. 401. Available at: http://www.bibliotheque.refer.org/livre59/l5905.pdf/ (accessed 07.02.2009).
13. Suchocka, H., 2016. Opinion of the Venice Commission on the place of the Constitutional Judiciary in a Democratic State. Ruch prawniczy, ekonomiczny i socjologiczny, (1).
14. Rigaux, M.Fr., 2008. Introduction of a Constitutional Review of Laws: Benefit, Purpose and Modalities, Report for the seminar on constitutional jurisdiction, Ramallah, (1).
