FUQAROLAR VA YURIDIK SHAXSLAR TOMONIDAN KONSTITUTSIYAVIY SUDLOV ORGANIGA MUROJAAT ETISHNING NAZARIY VA QIYOSIY-HUQUQIY TAHLILI
Kalit so‘zlar:
bilvosita konstitutsiyaviy murojaat, bevosita konstitutsiyaviy murojaat, aniq (konkret) murojaat, abstrakt murojaat, normativ konstitutsiyaviy murojaat, dastlabki sо‘rov, actio popularis, quasi popularis, amparoAnnotatsiya
Mazkur maqolada konstitutsiyaviy sudlov organlariga individual tarzda murojaat qilish bilan bog‘liq masalalar nazariy jihatdan о‘rganilib, xorij mamlakatlarida individual konstitutsiyaviy murojaatlarning turlari qiyosiy-huquqiy jihatdan tahlil qilingan. Individual konstitutsiyaviy murojaatlarning bevosita va bilvosita kо‘rinishlari mavjud bо‘lib, maqolada fuqarolar va yuridik shaxslar tomonidan konstitutsiyaviy sudlov organiga murojaat qilishning yuqorida ta’kidlangan kо‘rinishlarinining bir qancha turlari tahlil etilgan. Individual konstitutsiyaviy murojaatlarning turlari nazariy jihatdan ochib berilgan hamda markazlashgan yoki tarqoq konstitutsiyaviy nazorat о‘rnatilgan mamlakatlarda individual konstitutsiyaviy murojaatlarning samaradorlik darajasi va murojaat turlarining kamchiliklari har tomonlama tahlil etilgan. Bundan tashqari, maqolada individual konstitutsiyaviy murojaatlarning qaysi turlarida fuqaro va yuridik shaxslarning fundamental huquqlari konstitutsiyaviy sudlov organi tomonidan samarali himoya qilinishi va tiklab berilishi nazariy jihatdan ochib berilgan. Shuningdek, bir turdagi konstitutsiyaviy nazorat о‘rnatilgan davlatlarda individual konstitutsiyaviy murojaatning qanday turlari yaxshi natija berayotganligi hamda qanday kо‘rinishlarida fuqarolar va yuridik shaxslarning huquq va manfaatlari poymol etilishda davom etilayotganligi qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlil etilgan. Maqola sо‘ngida nazariy va qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlil yuzasidan xulosa taqdim etilgan.
Iqtiboslar
1. Kosimov B., 2020. Verxovenstvo prava i pandemiya koronavirusa COVID-19. Review of law sciences, (2), pp. 64-68.
2. Kosimov, B., 2020. Threats to judicial independence: reflections on the US experience. TSUL Legal Report International electronic scientific journal, no. 1 (1).
3. Harutyunyan, G., Nussberger, A. and Paczolay, P., 2009. Study on Individual Access To Constitutional Justice. Venice Commission [European Commission for Democracy Through Law], 538,
pp. 1-172.
4. Martin C.H., 2004. Comparative Human Rights Jurisprudence in Azerbaijan: Theory, Practice and Prospects. J. Transnat’l L. & Pol’y, 14, p.215.
5. Bericht des Schweizerischen Bundesgericht für die VII. Konferenz der europäischen Verfassungsgerichte, p. 17. Available at: http:// www.confcoconsteu.org/reports/Zwitserland-DE.pdf, (accessed 02.06.2009).
6. Harutyunyan G., Nussberger, A. and Paczolay, P., 2009. Study on Individual Access To Constitutional Justice. Venice Commission [European Commission for Democracy Through Law], 538, pp. 1-172.
7. Inson huquqlari bо‘yicha milliy institutlar tо‘g‘risida”gi Parij tamoyillariga kо‘ra, BMT Bosh Assambleyasining 48/134-sonli qarori, 20.12.1993.
8. G. Kucsko-Stadlmayer, “The Competences of European Ombudspersons – Description and Analysis of the Status Quo. Available at: http://www.ioi-europe.org/index2.html.
9. Van Aaken, A., 2006. Making International Human Rights Protection. In Conferences on new political economy (Vol. 23, p. 29). Mohr Siebeck.
10. Brunner, G., 2002. Der Zugang des Einzelnen zur Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit im europäischen Raum.
11. Czarnota A., 2007. Rights before courts: A study of constitutional courts in postcommunist states of Central and Eastern Europe.
12. Kelsen Н. Le contrôle de la constitutionnalité des lois: quelle procédure?. Actes du colloque international L’effectivité des droits fondamentaux dans les pays de la communauté francophone [The contradictory nature of the Constitution: the law of the Community]. Port-Louis (Île Maurice), 29-30 septembre, 1er octobre 1993, p. 401. Available at: http://www.bibliotheque.refer.org/livre59/l5905.pdf/ (accessed 07.02.2009).
13. Suchocka, H., 2016. Opinion of the Venice Commission on the place of the Constitutional Judiciary in a Democratic State. Ruch prawniczy, ekonomiczny i socjologiczny, (1).
14. Rigaux, M.Fr., 2008. Introduction of a Constitutional Review of Laws: Benefit, Purpose and Modalities, Report for the seminar on constitutional jurisdiction, Ramallah, (1).
