WAYS TO IMPROVE THE SYSTEM OF PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN UZBEKISTAN: COMPENSATORY MECHANISMS
Keywords:
intellectual property, compensatory mechanisms, patent law, copyright, trademarks, conditional compensation, case law, preventive measures, valuation standardsAbstract
The article analyzes compensatory mechanisms for the protection of intellectual property rights in the Republic of Uzbekistan. The creation of an effective system for the protection of intellectual property rights in the country is of great importance in the development of an innovative economy and ensuring compliance with international standards. The study examined existing shortcomings in national legislation on the protection of intellectual property rights. Examples from the judicial practice of foreign countries showed the preventive significance of large compensations. Practical proposals were made to increase the amount of conditional compensation, introduce the institution of tertiary compensation, ease the burden of proof, create specialized intellectual property courts, train judges and experts, and form a culture of intellectual property in society. Opinions were also put forward on improving legislation in this area.
References
1.Boies, Sch., & Flexner LLP. (2010, December). BSF wins largest damages verdict ever awarded for copyright infringement. 2.https://www.bsfllp.com/news-events/bsf-wins-largest-damages-verdict-everawarded-for-copyright.html
3.Code de la propriété intellectuelle. (2023). [French Intellectual Property Code]. Art. L331-1-4.
4.Consultative Council of European Judges. (2017). Opinion No. 20 (2017) on the role of courts with respect to the uniform application of the law (pp. 7, 9). https://rm.coe.int/opinion-no-20-2017-on-the-role-of-courts-with-respect-to-the-uniforma/16807661e3
5.Council of Europe. (2023). Issues affecting the consistency of judicial decisions and best practices in securing consistency in judicial decision making. https://rm.coe.int/issues-affecting-the-consistency-of-judicial-decisions-and-best-practi/1680afd8a5
6.De Werra, J. (2016). Specialised intellectual property courts – Issues and challenges (pp. 15–41). In Global perspectives for the intellectual property system (Issue 2). CEIPI-ICTSD. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2761209
7.EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2004, April). Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, art. 13(1). Official Journal of the European Union, L 157, 45.
8.Russian Federation. (2006). Civil Code. N 230-FZ.
9.International Organization for Standardization. (2010). ISO 10668: Brand valuation — Requirements for monetary brand valuation.
10.International Valuation Standards Council. (2025). IVS 210: Intangible assets. https://ivsc.org/standards/
Italian Industrial Property Code, Legislative Decree No. 30/2005, art. 125.
11.Legal IP Strategies. (2024). Exploring international approaches to IP valuation in intellectual property law. 12.https://legalipstrategies.com/international-approaches-to-ip-valuation/
Lukyanov, R. L. (2024). Kompensatsiya sifatida fuqarolik-huquqiy javobgarlik chorasi sifatida mutlaq huquqni buzganlik uchun [Compensation as a measure of civil liability for infringement of exclusive rights]. [PhD Thesis]. RGUP, Moscow.
13.Mamadiyev, A. A. (2025a). Intellektual mulkni himoya qilishda kompensatsiya institutini joriy qilish masalalari [Issues of introducing the institution of compensation in the protection of intellectual property]. ZDIF, 4(23), 24–30. https://zenodo.org/records/17286009
14.Mamadiyev, A. A. (2025b). Intellektual mulk huquqlarini kompensatsiyaviy himoya qilish: xalqaro amaliyot tahlili [Compensatory protection of intellectual property rights: Analysis of international practice]. Journal of Education, Ethics and Value, 4(9), 256–261. 15.https://jeev.innovascience.uz/index.php/jeev/article/view/1567
MVIP Solutions. (2024). Measuring the impact of IP on GDP and/or economic growth: Can it be truly calculated? 16.https://www.mvip.solutions/post/measuring-the-impact-of-ip-on-gdp-and-or-economic-growth-can-it-be-truly-calculated
OregonLive. (2008, May). Portland jury orders Payless to pay damages. 17.https://www.oregonlive.com/breakingnews/2008/05/portland_jury_orders_payless_t_1.html
Parr, R. L. (2018). Intellectual property: Valuation, exploitation, and infringement damages (5th
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURISPRUDENCE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
