Oʻzbekistonda intellektual mulk huquqlarini himoya qilish tizimini takomillashtirish yoʻllari: kompensatsiyaviy mexanizmlar
Kalit so‘zlar:
intellektual mulk, kompensatsiyaviy mexanizmlar, patent huquqi, mualliflik huquqi, savdo belgilari, shartli kompensatsiya, uchlamchi kompensatsiya, preventiv choralar, baholash standartlariAnnotatsiya
Maqolada Oʻzbekiston Respublikasida intellektual mulk huquqlarini himoya qilishning kompensatsiyaviy mexanizmlari tahlil qilingan. Mamlakatda intellektual mulk huquqlarini samarali himoya qilish tizimini yaratish innovatsion iqtisodiyotni rivojlantirish va xalqaro standartlarga muvofiqlikni taʼminlashda katta ahamiyat kasb etadi. Tadqiqotda intellektual mulk huquqlarini himoya qilishga oid milliy qonunchilikdagi mavjud kamchiliklar oʻrganildi. Xorijiy mamlakatlar sud amaliyotidan olingan misollarda yuqori miqdordagi kompensatsiyalarning preventiv ahamiyati koʻrsatildi. Shartli kompensatsiya miqdorlarini oshirish, uchlamchi kompensatsiya institutini joriy etish, isbotlash yukini yengillashtirish, maxsus intellektual mulk sudlarini tashkil etish, sudyalar va ekspertlarni tayyorlash hamda jamiyatda intellektual mulk madaniyatini shakllantirish boʻyicha amaliy takliflar berildi. Shuningdek, bu boradagi qonunchilikni takomillashtirishga oid fikrlar ilgari surildi.
Iqtiboslar
1.Boies, Sch., & Flexner LLP. (2010, December). BSF wins largest damages verdict ever awarded for copyright infringement. 2.https://www.bsfllp.com/news-events/bsf-wins-largest-damages-verdict-everawarded-for-copyright.html
3.Code de la propriété intellectuelle. (2023). [French Intellectual Property Code]. Art. L331-1-4.
4.Consultative Council of European Judges. (2017). Opinion No. 20 (2017) on the role of courts with respect to the uniform application of the law (pp. 7, 9). https://rm.coe.int/opinion-no-20-2017-on-the-role-of-courts-with-respect-to-the-uniforma/16807661e3
5.Council of Europe. (2023). Issues affecting the consistency of judicial decisions and best practices in securing consistency in judicial decision making. https://rm.coe.int/issues-affecting-the-consistency-of-judicial-decisions-and-best-practi/1680afd8a5
6.De Werra, J. (2016). Specialised intellectual property courts – Issues and challenges (pp. 15–41). In Global perspectives for the intellectual property system (Issue 2). CEIPI-ICTSD. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2761209
7.EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2004, April). Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, art. 13(1). Official Journal of the European Union, L 157, 45.
8.Russian Federation. (2006). Civil Code. N 230-FZ.
9.International Organization for Standardization. (2010). ISO 10668: Brand valuation — Requirements for monetary brand valuation.
10.International Valuation Standards Council. (2025). IVS 210: Intangible assets. https://ivsc.org/standards/
Italian Industrial Property Code, Legislative Decree No. 30/2005, art. 125.
11.Legal IP Strategies. (2024). Exploring international approaches to IP valuation in intellectual property law. 12.https://legalipstrategies.com/international-approaches-to-ip-valuation/
Lukyanov, R. L. (2024). Kompensatsiya sifatida fuqarolik-huquqiy javobgarlik chorasi sifatida mutlaq huquqni buzganlik uchun [Compensation as a measure of civil liability for infringement of exclusive rights]. [PhD Thesis]. RGUP, Moscow.
13.Mamadiyev, A. A. (2025a). Intellektual mulkni himoya qilishda kompensatsiya institutini joriy qilish masalalari [Issues of introducing the institution of compensation in the protection of intellectual property]. ZDIF, 4(23), 24–30. https://zenodo.org/records/17286009
14.Mamadiyev, A. A. (2025b). Intellektual mulk huquqlarini kompensatsiyaviy himoya qilish: xalqaro amaliyot tahlili [Compensatory protection of intellectual property rights: Analysis of international practice]. Journal of Education, Ethics and Value, 4(9), 256–261. 15.https://jeev.innovascience.uz/index.php/jeev/article/view/1567
MVIP Solutions. (2024). Measuring the impact of IP on GDP and/or economic growth: Can it be truly calculated? 16.https://www.mvip.solutions/post/measuring-the-impact-of-ip-on-gdp-and-or-economic-growth-can-it-be-truly-calculated
OregonLive. (2008, May). Portland jury orders Payless to pay damages. 17.https://www.oregonlive.com/breakingnews/2008/05/portland_jury_orders_payless_t_1.html
Parr, R. L. (2018). Intellectual property: Valuation, exploitation, and infringement damages (5th
Yuklab Olishlar
Nashr qilingan
Son
Bo‘lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 YURISPRUDENSIYA
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ostida litsenziyalangan.
