REGRESSION IS AN IMPORTANT AND NECESSARY STRUCTURAL ELEMENT OF THE SYSTEM OF CIVIL LAW LIABILITY
Keywords:
tort liability, recourse obligation, non-contractual obligation, compensation for damages, invalidity of transactions, public procurement, judicial practice, right of recourseAbstract
This article analyzes the role of tort and recourse obligations in the system of non-contractual obligations in civil law, their interconnection, and their legal nature. The obligation of recourse is defined as a secondary, but independent institution of tort law, and its main features and regulation in Article 1001 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan are considered. Also, in practice, the problems related to the invalidity of transactions due to non-compliance with the requirements of public procurement and the recovery of damage caused to the state budget from officials in the manner of recourse are highlighted. The conclusion substantiates the need to develop clarifications from the Plenum of the Supreme Court to form a unified judicial practice.
References
American Law Institute. (2011). Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. American Law Institute Publishers.
European Group on Tort Law. (2005). Principles of European tort law: Text and commentary. Springer.
Farnsworth, E. A. (2004). Contracts (4th ed.). Aspen Publishers.
Federal Republic of Germany. (2002). Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch [German Civil Code]. Federal Ministry of Justice.
French Republic. (1804). French Civil Code (Code civil des Français). Légifrance.
Kötz, H. (2017). European contract law. Oxford University Press.
Republic of Uzbekistan. (1996). Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-111189
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2013). Budget Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/2304138
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2021, April 22). On public procurement (Law No. LRU-684). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-5382974
Russian Federation. (1994). Civil Code of the Russian Federation. ConsultantPlus.
Supreme Economic Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2014, November 28). On Certain Issues Concerning the Application of Civil Legislation Norms by Economic Courts on Declaring Transactions Invalid (Resolution
No. 269). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-2535141#-2535912
Supreme Economic Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2007, June 1). On certain issues of applying civil legislation on property liability for non-performance or improper performance of obligations (Resolution No. 163). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-1636810
Supreme Economic Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2016, December 23). On certain issues of the application of legislation by economic courts in resolving disputes arising from construction procurement contracts (Resolution No. 306). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-3106543
Yegorov, A. V. (2002). Ponyatiye i pravovaya priroda regressnykh obyazatelstv v grazhdanskom prave [Concept and legal nature of regress obligations in civil law] (Doctoral dissertation). Lomonosov Moscow State University. Dissercat.
Zimmermann, R. (1996). The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (n.d.). https://sud.uz/
Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (n.d.). https://imv.uz/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURISPRUDENCE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
