REGRESS FUQAROLIK-HUQUQIY JAVOBGARLIK TIZIMINING MUHIM VA ZARUR TARKIBIY ELEMENTI
Kalit so‘zlar:
delikt majburiyati, regress majburiyati, shartnomadan tashqari majburiyat, zararni qoplash, bitimning haqiqiy emasligi, davlat xaridlari, sud amaliyoti, qaytarma talabAnnotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada fuqarolik huquqidagi shartnomadan tashqari majburiyatlar tizimida delikt va regress majburiyatlarining oʻrni, ularning oʻzaro bogʻliqligi hamda huquqiy tabiati tahlil qilingan. Regress majburiyati delikt huquqining ikkilamchi, ammo mustaqil instituti sifatida taʼriflanib, uning asosiy belgilari va Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik kodeksining 1001-moddasida tartibga solinishi koʻrib chiqilgan. Shuningdek, amaliyotda davlat xaridlari talablariga rioya qilmaslik oqibatida bitimlarning oʻz-oʻzidan haqiqiy emas deb topilishi va buning natijasida davlat byudjetiga yetkazilgan zararni mansabdor shaxslardan regress tartibida undirish bilan bogʻliq muammolar yoritilgan. Xulosada yagona sud amaliyotini shakllantirish uchun Oliy Sud Plenumining tushuntirishlarini ishlab chiqish zarurligi asoslab berilgan.
Iqtiboslar
American Law Institute. (2011). Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. American Law Institute Publishers.
European Group on Tort Law. (2005). Principles of European tort law: Text and commentary. Springer.
Farnsworth, E. A. (2004). Contracts (4th ed.). Aspen Publishers.
Federal Republic of Germany. (2002). Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch [German Civil Code]. Federal Ministry of Justice.
French Republic. (1804). French Civil Code (Code civil des Français). Légifrance.
Kötz, H. (2017). European contract law. Oxford University Press.
Republic of Uzbekistan. (1996). Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-111189
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2013). Budget Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/2304138
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2021, April 22). On public procurement (Law No. LRU-684). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-5382974
Russian Federation. (1994). Civil Code of the Russian Federation. ConsultantPlus.
Supreme Economic Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2014, November 28). On Certain Issues Concerning the Application of Civil Legislation Norms by Economic Courts on Declaring Transactions Invalid (Resolution
No. 269). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-2535141#-2535912
Supreme Economic Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2007, June 1). On certain issues of applying civil legislation on property liability for non-performance or improper performance of obligations (Resolution No. 163). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-1636810
Supreme Economic Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2016, December 23). On certain issues of the application of legislation by economic courts in resolving disputes arising from construction procurement contracts (Resolution No. 306). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-3106543
Yegorov, A. V. (2002). Ponyatiye i pravovaya priroda regressnykh obyazatelstv v grazhdanskom prave [Concept and legal nature of regress obligations in civil law] (Doctoral dissertation). Lomonosov Moscow State University. Dissercat.
Zimmermann, R. (1996). The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (n.d.). https://sud.uz/
Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (n.d.). https://imv.uz/
Yuklab Olishlar
Nashr qilingan
Son
Bo‘lim
Litsenziya
Mualliflik huquqi (c) 2026 YURISPRUDENSIYA
Ushbu ish Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ostida litsenziyalangan.
