DASTLABKI TERGOV YAKUNIDA VA SUD MUHOKAMASI BOSQICHIDA QAMOQDA SAQLASH MUDDATLARIGA RIOYA QILISH

Mualliflar

Kalit so‘zlar:

inson huquqlari, sud, hibsga olish uchun sanksiya, qamoq muddatini uzaytirish, prokuror, sud nazorati

Annotatsiya

Maqolada prokuror ayblov xulosasini tasdiqlaganida va ishni sudga topshirganda shaxsni hibsga olish muddatlari masalalari tahlil qilinadi. Muallif sudgacha va sud muhokamasining muhim jihatlari, masalan, qamoqqa olish shaklida ehtiyot chorasini tanlash, bunday qamoqqa olish muddatlari, qamoqqa olish muddatlarini uzaytirish masalalarini tadqiq qilgan. Shu bilan birga, sudgacha bo’lgan bosqichda, jinoyat ishini sudga topshirishda, ishni sud muhokamasiga tayinlashda, ishni qonunda belgilangan muddatlarda ko’rib chiqishda, hibsga olishda shaxsning huquq va erkinliklari qat’iy tartibga solinishiga qaramay, ba’zida undan og‘ish kuzatiladi. Muallif sud muhokamasiga tayinlangan shaxsning qamoqqa olish muddati masalalari va inson huquqlari hamda erkinliklarini kafolatlash maqsadida sud-tergov amaliyotining dolzarb muammolarini hal qilish bo’yicha aniq amaliy choralar taklif etadi. Qonunda ishni sudga tayyorlash va sudda ko’rib chiqish paytida shaxsni hibsga olish bilan bog’liq ba’zi masalalarni hal qiluvchi normalar ko’rsatilishi kerak.

Iqtiboslar

1. Karavaev I.V. Zaderzhaniye I zaklyucheniye pod strazhu: sravnitel’no-pravovoy analiz [Detention and detention: comparative legal analysis]. Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2020, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 145–153. DOI: 10.17803/1994- 1471.2020.112.3.145-153

2. Joldasbaevna S.D. Repeated crimes: legal aspects of criminal responsibility. World Bulletin of Management and Law, 2022, no. 17, pp. 80–83.

3. Sedelnikov P.V., Korobkov E.E., Beskembirova R.A. Polnomochiya prokurora po obrashcheniyu v sud s khodataystvom o prodlenii sroka izbrannoy v otnoshenii obvinyayemogo mery presecheniya [The powers of the prosecutor to apply to the court with a petition to extend the term of the preventive measure chosen against the accused]. Legitimacy, 2019, no. 1, pp. 49–53.

4. Saab A. The Nullity of the Criminal Judgment. Al Halabi Rights Publications, Beirut, 2007, p. 297.

5. Retyunskikh I.A. Ob osnovaniyakh zaderzhaniya litsa, podozrevayemogo v sovershenii prestupleniya [On the grounds of detention of a person suspected of committing a crime]. Bulletin of the Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2016, no. 1, pp. 18–21.

6. Shestak V.A. O sovershenstvovanii protsessual’nykh norm, reglamentiruyushchikh sroki soderzhaniya pod strazhey i poryadok ikh prodleniya [On the improvement of procedural norms regulating the terms of detention and the procedure for their extension]. Library of Criminalist, 2018, vol. 1 (36), pp. 114–117.

7. Abuanzeh A. The rationale for detention in the Jordanian Code of criminal procedure. A Comparative Study with French Law, 2022, October, vol. 8, iss. 10, 2022, p. e11164.

8. Liden M. Emotions and Cognition in International Criminal Justice: An Exploration from Cognitive Biases to Emotional Intelligence. Forensic Science International: Mind and Law, 2020, November, vol. 1, p. 100037.

9. Ebrahim J., Kermani, M.D. The U.S. Supreme Court on victimized children: The constitutional rights of the defendant versus the best interests of the child. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1991, September, vol. 30, iss. 5, pp. 839–844.

10. Bright D., Brewer R., Morselli C. Using social network analysis to study crime: Navigating the challenges of criminal justice records. Social Networks, 2021, July, vol. 66, pp. 50–64.

11. Bazarova D. Predubezhdeniye i yego vliyaniye na iskhod ugolovnogo dela: opyt SSHA. [Prejudice and its impact on the outcome of a criminal case: the US experience] Sovremennyye problemy razvitiya ugolovno-protsessual’nogo prava – Modern Problems of the Development of Criminal Procedure Law, 2023, no. 1 (1), pp. 28–35. Available at: https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/criminal-procedure-law/article/view/17146

12. Spiegel S.J. Climate injustice, criminalisation of land protection and anti-colonial solidarity: Courtroom ethnography in an age of fossil fuel violence. Political Geography, 2021, January, vol. 84, p. 102298

13. Suyunova D.J. An Analysis of the Procedural Features in Instituting Preliminary Hearing in a Criminal Case. Law & Safety, 2021, p. 223.

14. Bazarova D. Rol’ prokurora v obespechenii garantiy prav i svobod uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [The role of the prosecutor in ensuring guarantees of the rights and freedoms of participants in criminal proceedings]. Review of law sciences, 2020, no. 3, pp. 173–179.

15. Muminov B.A. Sudebnyy kontrol’ v dosudebnoy stadii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Judicial control in the pre-trial stage in criminal proceedings]. Doctor’s degree dissertation. Tashkent, Higher School of Judges attached to the Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2020, pp. 241, 242, 249.

Yuklab Olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2026-02-18

Qanday Iqtibos Keltirish

DASTLABKI TERGOV YAKUNIDA VA SUD MUHOKAMASI BOSQICHIDA QAMOQDA SAQLASH MUDDATLARIGA RIOYA QILISH. (2026). YURISPRUDENSIYA, 3(5), 99-106. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/604