KORPORATIV BOSHQARUV KODEKSINI NORMATIV-HUQUQIY HUJJAT SIFATIDA QABUL QILISH: MUAMMOLAR, ZARURAT VA TAKLIFLAR

Mualliflar

Kalit so‘zlar:

korporativ boshqaruv, korporativ boshqaruv kodeksi, soft law, comply or explain, agentlik nazariyasi, manfaatdor tomonlar nazariyasi, komplayens xarajatlari, aksiyadorlik jamiyati, korporativ nazorat

Annotatsiya

Mazkur maqolada korporativ boshqaruv kodeksini alohida normativ-huquqiy hujjat sifatida qabul qilishning maqsadga muvofiqligi yoki muvofiq emasligi masalasi ilmiy-amaliy nuqtayi nazardan tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqotda korporativ boshqaruvning nazariy asoslari, xususan agentlik nazariyasi va manfaatdor tomonlar nazariyasi yoritilib, korporativ boshqaruv kodeksining ex-ante nazorat mexanizmi sifatidagi o‘rni ochib berilgan. Shuningdek, AQSH, Buyuk Britaniya, Germaniya va OECD davlatlari tajribasi asosida korporativ boshqaruv kodeksining asosan soft law instrumenti sifatida, ya’ni rioya qil yoki tushuntir tamoyili asosida qo‘llanishi asoslab berilgan. Maqolada O‘zbekiston amaliyoti ham tahlil qilinib, korporativ boshqaruv kodeksiga normativ-huquqiy hujjat maqomi berilishining ortiqcha komplayens xarajatlari, byurokratik yuklamani kuchaytirishi mumkinligi haqida xulosa chiqarilgan. Natijada korporativ boshqaruv kodeksini majburiy normativ-huquqiy hujjat emas, balki moslashuvchan va tavsiyaviy tartibga solish vositasi sifatida saqlab qolish maqsadga muvofiq ekani asoslab berilgan.

Iqtiboslar

Black, B. S., Kim, W., & Jang, H. (2015). How corporate governance reforms in Korea affected firm value. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 31(3), 477–512.

Blair, M., & Stout, L. (2001). Director accountability and the mediating role of the corporate board. Washington University Law Quarterly, 79, 403–447.

Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2014). Resolution “On measures to further improve the corporate governance system in joint-stock companies” (No. 176). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-2420411

Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). Registration “On approval of the regulation on corporate governance in commercial banks” (No. 3254). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-4888804

Coffee, J. C. (2005). A theory of corporate scandals: Why the USA and Europe differ. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 198–211.

Corporate Finance Institute. (2020). Enron scandal: A series of financial wrongdoings that led to the collapse of Enron Corporation in 2001. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/esg/enron-scandal

Delaware General Corporation Law, Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 101 et seq. (2026). https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/

Dharmapala, D., & Khanna, V. (2018). The impact of mandated corporate social responsibility: Evidence from India’s Companies Act of 2013. International Review of Law and Economics, 56, 92–104.

Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. (2010). Why do foreign firms leave U.S. equity markets? The Journal of Finance, 65(4), 1507–1553.

European Commission. (2012). Action plan: European company law and corporate governance—A modern legal framework for more engaged shareholders and sustainable companies (COM(2012) 740 final). European Commission.

Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.

Federal Republic of Germany, Government Commission on the German Corporate Governance Code. (2022). German Corporate Governance Code. https://www.dcgk.de/en/code.html

Federal Republic of Germany. (1965). German Stock Corporation Act. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_aktg/index.html

Financial Reporting Council. (2024). The UK Corporate Governance Code 2024. Financial Reporting Council.

Gower, L. C. B., Davies, P. L., & Worthington, S. (2021). Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law (11th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.

Gulyamov, S. S. (2004). Pravovye problemy korporativnogo upravleniya: teoriya i praktika [Legal Problems of Corporate Governance: Theory and Practice]. TSIL Publ.

Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Pargendler, M., Ringe, W.-G., & Rock, E. (2017). The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Nasdaq. (n.d.). Market regulation. https://www.nasdaq.com/market-regulation

New York Stock Exchange. (n.d.). Regulation. https://www.nyse.com/regulation

OECD. (2025). OECD Corporate Governance Factbook 2025. OECD Publ. https://doi.org/10.1787/f4f43735-en

President of Republic of Uzbekistan. (2015). Decree “On measures for the introduction of modern corporate governance methods in joint-stock companies” (No. DP-4720). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-2635197

Saidov, I. (2023). The phenomenon of separation of ownership and control in corporate law. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 5(1), 1–9.

Saidov, I. (2025). Xo‘jalik jamiyatlarida direktor majburiyatlari doirasini belgilashning qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlili [Comparative Legal Analysis of Determining the Scope of Directors’ Duties in Business Companies] (Doctoral dissertation). Tashkent State University of Law.

State Assets Management Agency of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (n.d.). Kodeks korporativnogo upravlenija [Corporate Governance Code]. https://davaktiv.uz/ru/menu/kodeks-korporativnogo-upravlenija

Statistics Agency under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025). O‘zbekistonda 318,3 mingta MChJ faoliyat yuritmoqda [318.3 thousand LLCs are operating in Uzbekistan]. https://stat.uz/en/press-center/news-of-committee/65700-zbekistonda-318-3-mingta-mchzh-faoliyat-yuritmo-da-4

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (n.d.). Rules and regulations. https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations

United Kingdom Parliament. (2006). Companies Act 2006 (c. 46). The National Archives. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents

Yuldashev, J. I. (2024). Korporativ boshqaruvda sunʼiy intellektdan foydalanishni huquqiy tartibga solish [Legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence in corporate governance] (Abstract of doctoral dissertation). Tashkent State University of Law.

Yuklab Olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2026-07-16

Qanday Iqtibos Keltirish

KORPORATIV BOSHQARUV KODEKSINI NORMATIV-HUQUQIY HUJJAT SIFATIDA QABUL QILISH: MUAMMOLAR, ZARURAT VA TAKLIFLAR. (2026). YURISPRUDENSIYA, 6(3), 85-92. https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/756